Advertisement
Hong Kong's national security law
Hong KongLaw and Crime

Hong Kong leader unveils details of domestic national security legislation required under Article 23

  • Proposed law targets t­reason, insurrection, sabotage, foreign interference, theft of state secrets and espionage
  • ‘The new law aims to create a stable and safe environment so that when people attack us, we will be protected,’ city leader John Lee says

6-MIN READ6-MIN
44
People watch city leader John Lee announce the start of the Article 23 consultation process on Tuesday. Photo: Jelly Tse
Jeffie Lam

Hong Kong’s leader has unveiled plans to enact sweeping domestic national security legislation targeting ­treason, insurrection, sabotage, foreign interference, theft of state secrets and espionage, promoting it as a “defensive law” to ward off attacks against the city amid escalating geopolitical tensions between China and the West.

Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu on Tuesday underscored the external and internal national security threats facing the city as he launched a 30-day consultation exercise to gather public feedback on the legislation, which Hong Kong is duty bound to enact under Article 23 of its mini-constitution, the Basic Law.

“The new law aims to create a stable and safe environment so that when people attack us, we will be protected. This is a law to tell people not to attack us. It is, in a way, a defensive law,” Lee said.

Advertisement

“I hope people will see the law and know that they may try somewhere else rather than Hong Kong.”

(From left) Justice minister Paul Lam, city leader John Lee and security chief Chris Tang. Photo: Sam Tsang
(From left) Justice minister Paul Lam, city leader John Lee and security chief Chris Tang. Photo: Sam Tsang

Officials said law-abiding citizens would have nothing to fear, while they would be open to further discussing any need for exemptions based on public feedback.

Advertisement

It will be the city’s second attempt to enact the contentious legislation after the government’s last bid in 2003 sparked strong public opposition which forced the withdrawal of the bill.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x