Advertisement
Hong Kong courts
Hong KongLaw and Crime

Hong Kong ‘Dragon Slaying Brigade’ leader testimony ‘incoherent’, defence says

  • Counsel for defendant questions reliability of two defendants who became prosecution witnesses, urging jury to discard ‘contradictory’ evidence

2-MIN READ2-MIN
A protester during the 2019 social unrest. Defendant Cheung Ming-yu is among six men who have denied involvement in a plot to set off bombs to kill police officers that year. Photo: Felix Wong
Fiona Chow
A defence lawyer in a Hong Kong trial involving a thwarted 2019 bomb plot targeting police has questioned the reliability of the testimony provided by two defendants who became prosecution witnesses, labelling one as having “zero integrity”.

Barrister Thomas Iu Poon-shing asked the nine-strong jury on Thursday to find alleged brigade member Cheung Ming-yu not guilty, saying evidence from “Dragon Slaying Brigade” leader Wong Chun-keung was “incoherent” and “contradictory”.

Iu’s client, Cheung Ming-yu, is among six men who have denied involvement in a plot to set off bombs in Wan Chai on December 8, 2019, to kill police officers amid the months-long anti-government protests.

Advertisement

On the second day of giving closing statements in the High Court, Iu pressed on with his claims that Wong had kept his brigade in the dark about the plan to partner with mastermind Ng Chi-hung and his own team.

He said Wong’s testimony suggested he “deliberately” hid information from his teammates because he knew they would not agree to be involved if they knew guns and explosives were involved.

Advertisement

Iu said Wong admitted under cross-examination that he did not think it was “necessary” to tell the brigade that he was about to take part in a dangerous attack.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x