Advertisement

Hong Kong tainted water parties maintain they were unaware of health risks as official inquiry ends

Government fact-finding commission hears contrasting claims from lawyers for Housing Authority and builder

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Paul Shieh Wing-tai, counsel for the commission of inquiry, arriving at the hearing on Thursday. Photo: Dickson Lee

The finger-pointing over last year’s tainted water scare continued right up to the end of the five-month probe, which ended yesterday, with key parties all insisting they had not been told about the health risks posed by excessive lead in drinking water.

Advertisement

While the inquiry did not aim to apportion blame, a lawyer tasked with the fact-finding mission questioned whether the work culture of local government departments and authorities had contributed to the imbroglio.

The scandal broke in June last year when tests showed tap water at Kai Ching Estate in Kowloon City contained amounts of lead exceeding World Health Organisation standards.

Similarly high levels were later found at several other public housing estates and excessive lead was identified in materials used to solder pipes in the flats, prompting the government to set up a commission to investigate.

In making his closing submission, Dr Gerard McCoy SC, for contractor Paul Y., argued the builder bore less responsibility than the Housing Authority, which developed the affected public housing estates.

READ MORE: Plumbers should have known materials containing lead were banned, Hong Kong’s water authority tells inquiry

He said the authority was in a better position to supervise the projects, given its resources and expertise.

Advertisement
Advertisement