Lawyers who criticised jailing of young activists ‘misunderstand’ case and Hong Kong judicial system, Carrie Lam says
City’s leader dismisses foreign lawyers’ concerns over case which saw three democracy activists put behind bars for illegal protest
Hong Kong’s leader on Tuesday said a group of senior foreign lawyers who criticised the jailing of three young political activists in the city “had misunderstood the case” and the judicial system.
The comments from Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor came a day after Hong Kong’s justice department issued its own rebuke of the 12 lawyers, who on Monday released a joint letter expressing concern over the imprisonment.
Former student leaders Joshua Wong Chi-fung, Nathan Law Kwun-chung and Alex Chow Yong-kang were jailed in August for six to eights months for storming the Hong Kong government’s headquarters in an illegal protest that triggered the 79-day Occupy pro-democracy sit-ins of 2014.
The lawyers called the jail terms “a serious threat” to the rule of law and the “one country, two systems” principle under which Hong Kong is governed.
Wong and Law were originally given community service orders, and Chow a suspended jail sentence, for unlawful assembly. But they were eventually jailed after the Department of Justice took the trio back to an appeal court, demanding stronger punishments.
Jailing of Hong Kong Occupy trio a ‘serious threat’ to city’s rule of law, top foreign lawyers say in joint letter
Lam said on Tuesday: “The Department of Justice has issued a comprehensive response, and I have little to add. Basically, our response is that the joint letter shows that the signatories misunderstood the case and lacked understanding of Hong Kong’s judicial system.”
The lawyers signing the letter included former British lord chancellor Charles Falconer and five other queen’s counsels. American lawyer Jared Genser, who represented late Chinese Nobel laureate Liu Xiaobo and Myanmar’s Aung San Suu Kyi when she was under house arrest, was also among the signatories.
But in a 790-word response, a spokeswoman for the Department of Justice wrote: “The joint letter’s comments on judicial independence are totally unjustified … The judiciary remains truly independent and has displayed very high quality in its discharge of professional duties.”
Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam says she prays for city’s youth daily, warns them to ‘think thrice’ before breaking law
Justice Secretary Rimsky Yuen Kwok-keung has yet to respond to the letter. But at a forum for secondary school pupils organised by the Law Society on Sunday, he was asked if Beijing had been behind the jailing of Wong, Law and Chow.
“Categorically and very clearly, I can tell you that the [central government] was absolutely not involved,” Yuen said.
In the joint letter, the 12 lawyers said they regarded the imprisonment of the trio as “a breach of the principle of double jeopardy”, under which a person who has been acquitted or convicted of a crime will be spared any further prosecution for the same offence.
Former University of Hong Kong law dean Johannes Chan man-mun on Tuesday said that claim was inaccurate.
“The only inaccuracy I find in this letter is the concept of double jeopardy,” he said.
“In the strictest term, it’s not [double jeopardy]. It’s just an appeal for the same case. An appeal is not considered double jeopardy.”
But Chan noted that legal professionals and academics had expressed concern over whether the Court of Appeal deviated from the judgment of the facts put forward by the judge in the lower court.
“I hope the government has a more open-minded attitude but not a defensive one by saying that they [the signatories] don’t understand double jeopardy and they’re wrong,” Chan said.
“I think the main point is not whether Hong Kong’s judiciary can be independent. It’s how Hong Kong’s judicial independence is under pressure and influence from Beijing.”