Hong Kong Basic Law

I didn’t have a hand in activist Agnes Chow’s election ban, says Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam

Chief executive says she was at World Economic Forum in Switzerland when the decision was made – and the returning officer didn’t need help anyway

PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 31 January, 2018, 3:28pm
UPDATED : Wednesday, 31 January, 2018, 6:56pm

Hong Kong leader says she was not involved in the controversial decision to disqualify a young activist from running in the city’s coming legislative by-election.

Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor was speaking at a short question-and-answer session at the Legislative Council on Wednesday where she was grilled by pan-democratic lawmakers, who said the recent disqualification of Agnes Chow Ting had amounted to political censorship.

On Saturday, the returning officer said that Chow’s candidacy for the March 11 by-election was invalidon the grounds that the call for self-determination for Hong Kong – as advocated by her party Demosisto – went against the “one country, two systems” principle.

What Agnes Chow’s election ban means for youth politics in Hong Kong

“From the moment [Chow’s] candidacy was being considered to when the announcement of the disqualification was made, I was not in Hong Kong and hadn’t participated in the process,” Lam said, as she addressed a question from Civic Party lawmaker Alvin Yeung Ngok-kiu.

The chief executive reiterated that the returning officer had the power to determine the eligibility of candidates and would seek legal advice from the Department of Justice if needed.

Lam rejects foreign criticism over barring of democracy activist Agnes Chow from by-election

“When the decision was being made, I was not in Hong Kong and had spent a week in Switzerland for the World Economic Forum,” she explained. “But as the law and the factual basis are so clear, it appears that [the returning officer] did not need others – particularly me – to participate.”

As chief executive, Lam said she would not hesitate to offer her views on legal advice, and that was the same approach she adopted when she served as the chief secretary and minister.

Chaos breaks out at district council meeting over Agnes Chow’s disqualification from by-election

Asked by Yeung if she was trying to keep out of the saga, Lam replied: “Some decision-making power is not in the hands of the chief executive and I would not intervene in these decisions.”

But Democratic Party leader Wu Chi-wai was not convinced.

“No one would believe that the biggest power in Hong Kong is neither enjoyed by Sai Wan [Beijing’s liaison office] nor Central [the Hong Kong government] but a returning officer,” he said.

Wu urged Lam to clarify whether the election ban on Chow and her party colleagues was lifelong and under what circumstances they could contest an election again, adding the ban had violated Chow’s equal election rights as enshrined in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

Hong Kong not unique in barring some from running in elections 

Lam did not answer the question, saying it was hard to foresee the future as she could not guarantee both the law and the facts, concerning the political party, would remain unchanged for good.

She added Chow could appeal the decision through judicial means.

Meanwhile, electoral officials on Wednesday had yet to formally approve the candidacy of Au Nok-hin, whom the pro-democracy camp designated to replace Chow.

Au was expected to learn his fate on Thursday at the latest, ahead of a briefing for candidates to be held that evening.

He submitted his nominations for the Hong Kong Island constituency on Saturday.

Chow’s disqualification triggered an outcry among opposition politicians and legal experts, with the European Union saying the city’s reputation as a free and open society would take a hit. 

Patten and Ashdown call on UK PM Theresa May to speak up for Hong Kong during China trip

Lam was speaking at her first 30-minute question time in Legco. She had offered to take lawmakers’ questions in person as often as once or twice a month, in addition to the four 90-minute question-and-answer sessions the chief executive attends at the legislature each year.

Pro-establishment lawmakers, in contrast, all focused on livelihood issues – such as the need to import foreign labour and elderly welfare – and did not raise any thorny political issues.