Advertisement
Hong Kong localism, independence
Hong KongPolitics

Ignoring Hong Kong National Party’s requests for evidence and more time will boost legal efforts to overturn a ban, source says

Pro-independence group has been given until August 7 to say why it should not be banned but it wants an extension

3-MIN READ3-MIN
Co-founder of the Hong Kong National Party Andy Chan wants the police force to hand over all surveillance materials it used to support its recommendation for the party to be banned. Photo: Nora Tam
Alvin Lum

A pro-independence party labelled as an “imminent threat” to Hong Kong’s national security said it would have a stronger legal case against the authorities if they ignored its demands for more time to respond to a plan to ban it and for police surveillance materials to be handed over.

Such a reaction would only boost the Hong Kong National Party’s efforts to challenge any ban on its operations on the basis of “procedural unfairness”, a member of the legal team of party leader Andy Chan Ho-tin said on Monday.

“The lack of an extension to reply may be grounds to seek a judicial review, if there is a ban on the party,” the source said.

Advertisement
Activists protest the proposed ban on the party. Photo: Edmond So
Activists protest the proposed ban on the party. Photo: Edmond So

“Even if the evidence the police are relying on comes from media reports, one still has to ensure accuracy in the documents used to [build a case against the party], and Chan just doesn’t have enough time [to go through all the media reports].”

Chan’s legal team issued a request to the city’s Security Bureau for a two-month extension to reply to the ban proposal last week. On Friday, it asked for surveillance materials to be handed over by Monday, three days later.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x