bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

paywallTypes

createdDate

publishedDate

urlAlias

moreOnThisArticles

sponsorType

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

articleSpeeches

socialHeadline

headline

images

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Alvin Lum

Political journalist covering in Hong Kong politics, justice system and policy analysis.


Hong Kong’s leader and two leading legal bodies have strongly condemned an “unfounded” attack on local judges by Beijing loyalists who accused them of being too lenient in granting bail to protesters and failing to hand down deterrent sentences.
In three separate statements issued on Friday, Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor, the Hong Kong Bar Association and the Law Society of Hong Kong rebuked the remarks by pro-Beijing group Defend Hong Kong Campaign at a rally against the judges on Thursday.
The group had also called on Chief Justice Geoffrey Ma Tao-li to resign.
Lam said the rule of law and judicial independence were the core values of Hong Kong and needed to be upheld by everyone.




She said no one should exert pressure on judges and courts, or make personal attacks on them.
The barristers’ group also condemned the attack, saying: “The Hong Kong Bar Association deplores any attack on the judiciary or any of its members.”
While the public have the freedom to rationally debate judicial rulings, the barristers’ group said there was no justification for exerting pressure on judges, and warned it could “constitute interference with judicial proceedings and contempt of court”.
In a similar strongly-worded statement, the Law Society, which represents practising solicitors, stressed the courts were always tasked to adjudicate a case impartially based on the law, “whatever the nature of the controversy and whoever the parties may be”.
“We strongly condemn the unfounded comments that judicial decisions were made or influenced by political considerations, which are unjustified and damaging to our legal system, and to Hong Kong as a whole,” it said in the statement.

Pro-Beijing protesters and mainland Chinese scholars have questioned local courts for granting bail to convicted protesters, but the Bar Association said Hong Kong’s magistrates were merely following the law.
Under Hong Kong’s Criminal Procedure Ordinance, the accused’s right to bail is denied only when there is a risk of fleeing, committing the offence again or interfering with prosecution witnesses.
“Judges and magistrates do not have a general discretion to refuse bail,” the association said.
Withdrawal of bill not to compromise with protesters, chief secretary says
“The bail decision-making process is structured, fair and blind to extraneous considerations, such as politics, nationality, sex or race.”
Of the more than 1,300 people arrested since protests against the extradition bill – which the city’s leader has announced will be withdrawn – erupted in early June, at least 191 have been charged with offences ranging from assaulting a police officer to rioting. Among those charged, 164 have been granted bail.

City’s judges have become a new target of hardline tabloid the Global Times and local pro-government people. The Beijing newspaper questioned the city’s bail system in at least two pieces over past weeks, and portrayed the criminal justice system as “police arresting people, judges letting them go”.
About 100 activists of Defend Hong Kong Campaign held a rally outside the Court of Final Appeal in Central on Thursday and waved the Chinese flag, while criticising the city’s trial judges for “helping” the arrested by granting them bail.
Will extradition bill withdrawal appease or embolden Hong Kong protesters?
The Department of Justice also strongly condemned the accusations on Thursday, stressing that judges always adhered to the law and evidence before them.
“Some may not like the outcome but it does not mean that the independence of the judiciary is in any way compromised,” the department said.
“The community should not make any arbitrary or unfair criticisms which seek to undermine the integrity or impartiality of the judiciary.”


Hong Kong engineer gets 5 years over HK$6 million laundering and bribery offences

Hong Kong court’s verdict in Jimmy Lai trial sheds light on law, experts say

Trump urges Xi to show leniency for Jimmy Lai as Britain summons China’s ambassador

Jimmy Lai verdict a testament to Hong Kong’s rule of law

Hong Kong courts

Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam and legal bodies condemn ‘unfounded’ attack on local judges by Beijing loyalists

Pro-government demonstrators gather outside the Court of Final Appeal in Central to demand resignation of Chief Justice Geoffrey Ma. Photo: Nora Tam

Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal Geoffrey Ma Tao-li attends Ceremonial Opening of Legal Year 2019. 14JAN19 SCMP/ Robert Ng

epa06863080 A statue representing Justice is displayed on the Court of Final Appeal in Central district, Hong Kong, China, 04 July 2018. In a landmark ruling, Hong Kong’s top court ruled unanimously in favour of a lesbian expatriate, requiring the city’s Immigration Department to grant lifelong same-sex couples spousal visas just as it would for those who are married and heterosexual. The court's decision means the marriage status and civil union partnerships of same-sex couples will be recognised in Hong Kong for the specific purpose of a dependant visa. EPA-EFE/JEROME FAVRE

Beijing piles pressure on Hong Kong developers, calling on government to seize land being ‘hoarded for profit’

The Lands Resumption Ordinance allows the government to take back privately leased land for an established ‘public purpose’. Photo: Winson Wong

Li Ka-shing leaves his home in Deep Water Bay. Hong Kong tycoon Li, chairman of CK Group, is expected to announce his retirement during two annual general meetings of the CK Hutchison Holdings and CK Asset Holdings later today. 11MAY18 SCMP / Edward Wong

Pro-government demonstrators demand resignation of Hong Kong Chief Justice Geoffrey Ma over ‘lenience’ shown to democracy activists

Pro-China members gather at the Court of Final Appeal in Central as part of a flashmob. 12SEP19 SCMP / Nora Tam

Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam unmoved by tycoon Li Ka-shing’s call for ‘mercy’ on anti-government protesters

Carrie Lam said “an escalation of violence will not solve society’s problems”. Photo: Sam Tsang

News

Hong Kong

Politics


Activists from Defend Hong Kong Campaign on Thursday accused judges of being too lenient in granting bail to anti-government protesters
City leader, the Hong Kong Bar Association and the Law Society respond to defend the rule of law and judicial independence



Carrie Lam and two legal bodies defend the rule of law and judicial freedom in the face of attack by Beijing loyalists over granting bail to protesters.
