Advertisement

Hong Kong mask ban constitutional for all public meetings and processions, top court rules, backing use of colonial-era law

  • Court of Final Appeal sides with government over use of emergency powers
  • Mask ban was introduced during height of civil unrest in 2019

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
28
Protesters rally in Central against the new anti-mask law introduced by the Hong Kong government in October 2019. Photo: Felix Wong
A mask ban imposed by the government at the height of last year’s civil unrest was constitutionally valid because it was necessary for dealing with the violent chaos involved, Hong Kong’s top court ruled on Monday.

Siding with the government, the Court of Final Appeal went even further than a lower court ruling to find the law, previously deemed constitutional only when used at unlawful and unauthorised assemblies, to be applicable to all public meetings and processions.

Shortly after the release of the judgment, Kowloon City Court became the first to convict and sentence a protester for breaching the mask ban on Monday afternoon, sentencing a student to three months in jail for the offence.

Advertisement

The top court also found it was constitutionally sound for the government to invoke the colonial-era Emergency Regulations Ordinance to impose such a ban, on the grounds of public danger.

The five justices ruled unanimously that the ban was appropriate as it was in line with, and no more than, what the government required to deter peaceful protests from turning violent.

Advertisement

“The interests of Hong Kong as a whole should be taken into account since the rule of law itself was being undermined by the actions of masked lawbreakers who, with their identities concealed, were seemingly free to act with impunity,” they said in a 71-page judgment.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x