Advertisement
Universities in Hong Kong
Hong KongPolitics

University of Hong Kong bypassed normal disciplinary procedure in banning student leaders from campus, insiders say

  • The students, under investigation for a resolution mourning the death of a police attacker, were given no chance to defend themselves, says governing council member who resigned
  • Another source notes the absence of a disciplinary committee in the case, saying the council was taking a ‘top-down’ approach

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
8
Workers remove the sign from the University of Hong Kong’s student union office after the school stripped it of recognition last month. Photo: Winson Wong
Lilian ChengandChan Ho-him
Insiders have said a University of Hong Kong decision to ban more than 30 student leaders from campus sidestepped normal disciplinary procedure, a move that has provoked concern among some and led to a member of the school’s governing body resigning.

Sources spoke to the Post shortly after HKU’s governing council on Wednesday ruled that all student leaders involved in last month’s passing of a resolution mourning the death of a man who stabbed a police officer would be banned from stepping foot on campus or using any of its facilities and services.

But HKU council chairman Arthur Li Kwok-cheung on Thursday said the decision was about risk mitigation for the university and should not be seen as disciplinary action.

Advertisement
University of Hong Kong council chairman Arthur Li had chosen a ‘top-down’ approach to the student leaders’ punishment, a source said. Photo: Dickson Lee
University of Hong Kong council chairman Arthur Li had chosen a ‘top-down’ approach to the student leaders’ punishment, a source said. Photo: Dickson Lee

The move prompted law lecturer Eric Cheung Tat-ming to resign as a council member on Wednesday night.

Advertisement

Cheung said he had asked the council to postpone the special meeting as it was arranged in an abrupt manner and he was unable to attend. He also asked if he could take a look at the report confidentially, but the council insisted on going ahead with the meeting without allowing him to do so.

“I told the council that I disagree with any punishment decisions they made, as the students involved did not have any chance to defend themselves through regular procedures,” he told the Post. “That was disappointing. The students were wrong, but they should be given a chance to explain.”

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x