Hong Kong’s reputation takes hit after national security law imposed but foreign forces to blame, Carrie Lam says
- The city leader insists that her government simply needs to do a better job of explaining the law
- Lam made the remarks on a new RTHK limited series that will review her administration’s work since 2017
Lam made the remarks on the first episode of a new RTHK limited series called Overview Policy, which debuted on Wednesday and will review her government’s work dating back to when she ascended to the city’s top office in 2017. The Chinese-language programme, which is also expected to review the work of ministers in Lam’s government, will air every Wednesday at 8pm on RTHK’s TV31 channel.
The next chief executive election is slated for March 2022, but Lam, whose first term will end the following June, has not indicated whether she will run again.
Sidelined Carrie Lam says her fractured elbow could take weeks to heal
“Undeniably, our international reputation has been somewhat impaired after the implementation of the national security law,” she told the hosts.
“It is mainly because many foreign politicians, organisations, foreign forces and even some foreign media have exaggerated the normal law enforcement work under the law as suppression of human rights and freedoms,” she added. “We need to do more effective explanatory work in this regard.”
The law, imposed on Hong Kong by Beijing in June of last year, criminalises acts of secession, subversion, terrorism and collusion with foreign forces. There are currently scores of opposition politicians and activists in jail awaiting trial under the law. Offenders face penalties ranging up to life imprisonment.
But in spite of the law, Lam maintained Hong Kong’s international status as a bridge between mainland China and the outside world was as strong as ever.
Both Article 23 and Beijing’s constitutional jurisdiction over Hong Kong have been taboo topics in recent years, Lam said, because of fears they could spark misunderstandings about the abridgment of the civil rights and “high degree of autonomy” enshrined in the city’s mini-constitution.
Why housing was not Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam’s biggest headache
“If we cannot make it clear [to the people] on this constitutional order, and if we just keep it fuzzy, how can we ensure the smooth and steady successful practice of the ‘one country, two systems policy’? How can we avoid taking the wrong track?” she asked.
“I hope the future terms of government will approve what is right and condemn what is wrong. Especially on such important, high-level principles, the government should tell the people plainly that the central government has overall jurisdiction over Hong Kong, but the central government also very much respects the autonomy of Hong Kong.”
Asked about her policy address, Lam noted there were no major disputes as to the basic principles of the initiatives she mentioned.
“People do agree to having a transport and infrastructure-led approach for development. People also applaud developing more land [for housing]; and developing more land for innovation and technology is also welcomed,” she said.