Advertisement

Decision on whether to axe minister over Omicron ‘partygate’ set to reveal how Beijing will enforce accountability among Hong Kong’s new ‘patriotic’ political elite

  • Home affairs chief Caspar Tsui is said to be on his way out after angering city leader Carrie Lam by apparently flouting social-distancing rules at a birthday party
  • But axing a minister is hardly straightforward in Hong Kong, where power lies with Beijing as well as the leader

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
22
Chief Executive Carrie Lam and Secretary for Home Affairs Caspar Tsui in September last year. Photo: Nora Tam

A rare expected departure of a cabinet minister in Hong Kong has revealed the delicate relationship between the central authorities, the city’s leader and Beijing loyalists on political appointments and where the buck stops.

Insiders revealed that Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor had insisted on being tough towards Secretary for Home Affairs Caspar Tsui Ying-wai, the most high-­profile Hong Kong official who attended an infamous Omicron-hit birthday bash early this month, despite intense behind-the-scenes lobbying from his party, the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong (DAB).

Tsui is likely to vacate his post as the central government had already started on the procedures involved, several sources familiar with the matter told the Post.

Executive Council member Ip Kwok-Him. Photo: K. Y. Cheng
Executive Council member Ip Kwok-Him. Photo: K. Y. Cheng
Under the Basic Law, the city’s mini-constitution, the appointment and removal of principal officials in Hong Kong must be approved by the central government. Establishment sources said this was not a mere formality, as Beijing had the final say, especially on more senior positions, even if there was room for the city’s government to also seek to influence such decisions.
Advertisement

While Lam was pushing for a tough approach toward Tsui, Beijing had to consider carefully the impact of terminating a minister this way, a source familiar with Hong Kong-mainland Chinese affairs said.

It would mean setting a precedent on the standards of accountability for ministers, with implications on not just the conduct expected of them, but also their handling of problems. This was why there had to be careful deliberations, the source said, adding the pro-establishment camp had been advised “not to add fuel to the fire”.

Advertisement

Privately at least, they had done so, with, for example, Ip Kwok-him, a member of the Executive Council, Lam’s de facto cabinet, raising Tsui’s fate with the city leader during three meetings of the top policymaking body since the incident hit the headlines on January 6, sources told the Post.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x