Advertisement
Advertisement
Hong Kong national security law (NSL)
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
A banner promoting the national security law in Hong Kong’s Quarry Bay. Photo: Sun Yeung

‘Abandon arrogance, face fact that national security law has restored stability in Hong Kong’: Beijing to UN Human Rights Committee on report proposing repeal of legislation

  • Chinese government’s foreign ministry, the Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office and Beijing’s liaison office all hit back at UN report that expressed ‘grave concern’
  • Spokesman also slams EU’s support for UN report, accusing body of ‘hyping up Hong Kong-related issues’
Beijing has urged the UN Human Rights Committee to “abandon arrogance and face the fact” that the national security law has restored social stability in Hong Kong, after the watchdog proposed the city should “take concrete steps” to repeal the law over threatened civil freedoms.

The Chinese government’s foreign ministry, the Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office (HKMAO), and Beijing’s liaison office in Hong Kong all hit back on Thursday after a report released by the UN committee expressed “grave concern” at an “overly broad interpretation” and “arbitrary application” of the security legislation.

It also called for reform of Hong Kong’s electoral system to increase the number of directly elected seats in the Election Committee, a powerful body that selects the city’s leader, and the Legislative Council.

Beijing’s liaison office in the Sai Ying Pun district of Hong Kong. Photo: Bloomberg

In a statement released by Xinhua, the Chinese state press agency, a spokesman for the cabinet-level HKMAO expressed “firm opposition and strong dissatisfaction” over the UN report, calling comments in the paper “biased and untrue”.

“The promulgation and implementation of the national security law in Hong Kong has helped to restore the rule of law and order, protect residents’ peaceful [lives], bring economic and social development back on track, and promote Hong Kong’s transition from chaos to governance.”

The spokesman also insisted the security law “prevents, stops and punishes illegal acts” by a small minority of people, and guaranteed the rights and freedoms enjoyed by residents. He suggested that the UN needed to be “objective” in promoting human rights.

“We sincerely hope that the future reports of the UN Human Rights Committee will be more factual and less biased and fallacious in the future,” he added.

Chinese and Western diplomats trade barbs over Hong Kong leadership election

In a separate statement, also released by Xinhua, a spokesman for Beijing’s liaison office said the central government needed to impose the security law to counter foreign interference.

“We urge relevant international institutions to abandon their arrogance and prejudice, face the successful practice of ‘one country, two systems’ and the basic fact that the Hong Kong national security law maintains social stability and fully protects human rights, and make due objective and fair judgments,” the spokesman said.

Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu also said on Friday that the UN report was misleading. He said the security law’s goals were to restore social stability and prohibit acts that endanger national security in Hong Kong, and were similar to the purposes of similar laws in other countries.

Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian. Photo: Kyodo

Earlier on Thursday, the European Union issued a statement in support of the UN report, saying: “The EU supports the Human Rights Committee’s recommendations, in particular to repeal both the national security law and the sedition law, and to refrain, immediately, from applying them.”

The remarks drew the ire of the Chinese foreign ministry’s office in Hong Kong, which accused the EU of “hyping up Hong Kong-related issues and slandering the central government’s policy towards Hong Kong”.

No need to reveal evidence of foreign interference in Hong Kong: CY Leung

“The concluding remarks in the report were completely inconsistent with the real human rights situation in Hong Kong and unconvincing. Yet the EU jumped out impatiently to make irresponsible remarks and accusations about Hong Kong affairs, this fully exposed its hypocrisy and sinister intentions of ‘playing the Hong Kong card’,” ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said.

“We urge the EU to put its position right … immediately stop slandering Hong Kong’s rule of law and judicial independence, and immediately stop interfering in Hong Kong affairs and China’s internal affairs.”

41