Advertisement
LGBTQ
Hong KongSociety

Lead on recognising same-sex unions in Hong Kong must start with government not courts, lawyers and activists say

  • Burden should not be left on people to mount legal challenges on the grounds of discrimination, human rights lawyers and activists say
  • Raymond Chan, city’s only openly gay legislator, calls for public consultation on allowing same-sex unions in Hong Kong

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Activist Jimmy Sham had filed a lawsuit for Hong Kong to recognise overseas same-sex marriages. Photo: Felix Wong
Laura Westbrook

Lawyers and activists have urged the government to take the lead in drawing up a legal framework for the recognition of same-sex relationships in Hong Kong rather than leaving decisions to the courts, which struck down a major case seeking to recognise foreign gay marriages last week.

They accused the administration of leaving the burden on people to mount legal challenges on the grounds of discrimination, which could be expensive, time-consuming and emotionally draining for plaintiffs.

The LGBT community was disappointed by the High Court’s ruling on September 18 when it rejected a bid by civic rights activist Jimmy Sham Tsz-kit, who filed a lawsuit for Hong Kong to recognise foreign same-sex marriages. Sham argued that the government’s decision not to recognise marriages performed overseas, such as his, which was registered in New York, violated the right to equality guaranteed by Article 25 of the Basic Law, the city’s mini-constitution.
Advertisement
The High Court has had to deal with a number of cases in recent years. Photo: Warton Li
The High Court has had to deal with a number of cases in recent years. Photo: Warton Li

However, Justice Anderson Chow Ka-ming found Sham’s attempt to achieve complete parity of legal recognition “too ambitious” and “fundamentally flawed” when the basic question of whether there was differential treatment “cannot be answered in a vacuum”, without subject matter or context, which Hong Kong’s top court had ruled as a “crucial” consideration.

Advertisement

Sham was considering whether to file an appeal, according to a source. Plaintiffs have 28 days to do so for final hearings.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x