bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

paywallTypes

corrections

sponsorType

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Agence France-Presse

South Africa’s top court on Friday ruled that parliament had failed to hold President Jacob Zuma accountable for using public money for private home upgrades, a move that could lead to impeachment proceedings.
Opposition parties had gone to the Constitutional Court to argue that the speaker of parliament failed to enforce the appropriate processes to censure Zuma over the scandal.
Zuma had failed to abide by recommendations made by the country’s anti-corruption watchdog in 2014 over refurbishments at his personal home in the eastern KwaZulu-Natal province that misused US$15 million of taxpayers’ money.
The scandal came to a dramatic climax when the Constitutional Court last year found the president guilty of violating his oath of office by refusing to pay back the cash.

“We conclude that [the National] Assembly did not hold the president to account,” said Constitutional Court judge Chris Jafta.
“The failure by the National Assembly to make rules regulating removal of the president … constitutes a violation” of the constitution, the court said.
It ordered that the National Assembly “must comply” with the constitution and make rules that could be used for the removal of the president “without delay”.
Defeated in court and facing mounting public criticism, Zuma later relented and paid US$500,000, a sum set by the treasury following last year’s ruling.
He has reached a point at which he is like Saddam Hussein in a hole and there is no other chamber to go except to come out
COPE leader Mosiuoa Lekota
In power since 2009, Zuma stepped down last week as president of the ruling African National Congress (ANC) party after a 10-year term marked by numerous damning court judgments against him.
Friday’s ruling is expected to pile pressure on the beleaguered leader to resign before the end of his term in 2019.
Zuma was succeeded by his deputy Cyril Ramaphosa in a tightly fought contest in which his former wife Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma also ran.
Sydney Mufamadi, an ANC stalwart who has known Zuma for decades, said the president would not step aside because he had no “sense of shame” and called on parliament to act following the judgment.
“This is going to be an acid test of the new leadership of the ANC and parliament,” said Mufamadi, who is now director of the School of Leadership at the University of Johannesburg. “Parliament has the authority to remove him … not to protect an errant president.”
The ANC’s deputy secretary general Jessie Duarte said the party had noted the ruling and would “discuss its full implications” when its decision-making National Executive Committee meets on January 10.
One of the opposition parties that took the matter to court, Congress of the People, said the ruling had left Zuma exposed and put the ANC under pressure to act against him.

“He has reached a point at which he is like Saddam Hussein in a hole and there is no other chamber to go except to come out. He’s got to come out now,” said COPE leader Mosiuoa Lekota.
In a statement the National Assembly said it had “already initiated a process, as part of its overhaul of rules” to put in place a procedure for removing a sitting president.
Ralph Mathekga, a political analyst, said the judgment would strengthen the position of those wanting to remove Zuma.
“Zuma is on his way out, the only difference is how ANC members will negotiate with him. It’s going to take negotiations with Zuma so that he can leave office,” Mathekga said.
The main opposition Democratic Alliance party has said it will seek to have its parliamentary motion of impeachment against Zuma “re-tabled” as soon as possible.


Israel refuses entry to 2 EU lawmakers, accuses 1 of promoting boycotts

China slams Australia for ‘hyping up’ PLA live-fire drills off its coast

UK foreign secretary questions Russia’s ‘appetite’ for peace at South Africa G20 meeting

Rwanda-backed rebels reach major east DR Congo city

South Africa

Zuma ‘like Saddam Hussein in a hole’ after South Africa’s top court delivers impeachment blow

File photo of South African President Jacob Zuma. Photo: EPA

FILE - In this Monday, Dec. 18, 2017 file photo, outgoing ANC president and South African President Jacob Zuma, looks on after the newly elected African National Congress (ANC) President Cyril Ramaphosa, was announced president at the elective conference in Johannesburg. South Africa's top court has ruled that parliament failed to hold President Jacob Zuma accountable in a scandal over multi-million-dollar upgrades to his private home. The decision is likely to escalate pressure on Zuma to resign. (AP Photo/Themba Hadebe, File)

epa06409078 (FILE) - Outgoing ANC President, Jacob Zuma, dances on stage during the 54th ANC National Conference held at the NASREC Convention Centre, Johannesburg, South Africa, 18 December 2017. South Africa highest court ruled on 29 December that parliament failed to comply with its duties in holding President Zuma to account for spending public funds. The ruling stated that parliament must now set rules for impeachment during it's next sitting. EPA-EFE/KIM LUDBROOK

News

World

Africa