Malawi court nullifies results of presidential election, hoping move won’t ‘destroy nation’

The Constitutional Court in the southern African nation of Malawi on Monday nullified the results of last year’s presidential election, citing “widespread, systematic and grave” irregularities including significant use of correction fluid to alter the outcome. A new vote will be held within 150 days, the court said, saying at the end that it hoped the ruling would not “destroy the nation”. The two leading opposition candidates had challenged the narrow election win of President Peter Mutharika, alleging that irregularities affected over 1.4 million of the total 5.1 million votes cast. Months of sometimes deadly unrest followed the announcement of the election results. The president and electoral commission acknowledged some irregularities but argued they were insufficient to affect the election’s outcome. Monday’s ruling can be appealed to the Supreme Court. Security was tight and people across the country followed the day-long court session, read out in English and Chichewa, live on radio broadcasts. Many listened spellbound as the court listed multiple irregularities, from the liberal use of the correction fluid Tipp-Ex to the lack of signatures on some results forms. The judges even challenged the electoral system, saying the results suggested that no one was elected by a majority in accord with the Constitution, citing dictionary definitions of majority and plurality. It suggested that Malawi’s Elections Act be amended. The long-peaceful southern African nation has never had a presidential vote overturned. In 2017, Kenya’s Supreme Court shocked that country by annulling the presidential election, citing irregularities. President Uhuru Kenyatta won the fresh election as the leading opposition candidate boycotted the vote. British soldier killed in Malawi by elephants he was sent to protect Mutharika had been declared the narrow winner of Malawi’s May election with 38 per cent of votes, followed by Lazarus Chakwera with 35 per cent and former vice-president Saulos Chilima third with 20 per cent. The four other candidates collectively got nearly 6 per cent. The five-judge panel heard arguments that the vote was rigged by the president and the electoral commission. Mutharika and the electoral commission acknowledged some irregularities but argued they were insufficient to affect the election’s outcome. The months-long court case was accompanied by sometimes violent street protests demanding the resignation of electoral commission chairwoman Jane Ansah. The Malawi Human Rights Commission late last year released a report accusing the police of serious human rights abuses, including rape and assault, in one confrontation. The two opposition candidates in recent days called for calm. On Thursday, Chilima urged Malawians to remain peaceful and challenged Mutharika to show the qualities of a true statesman. He also asked the Malawi Police Service, which has been supported by the military as unrest grew, to stop thugs who may want to take advantage of any public outcry after the ruling. “There is more that binds us than that which separates us,” he said. “Violence and civil strife are alien to this land. We must not lose this gem. It is what defines us a people.” Madonna marks 60th birthday with US$60,000 Malawi fundraiser The international community, including the United Nations and African Union, issued several statements ahead of the vote urging people across Malawi to uphold the rule of law and remain calm. A joint statement by diplomats from the United States, Britain, the European Union, Japan and others acknowledged the tensions around the ruling. “Malawi can draw on an impressive history of institutions and leaders stepping forward to safeguard your democracy and ensure peaceful resolution for internal tensions,” the statement said, urging all parties to respect the court’s decision – as well as the right to appeal.

Malawi court nullifies results of presidential election, hoping move won’t ‘destroy nation’

.css-1mniedq{color:inherit;font-weight:inherit;font-size:inherit;font-family:inherit;line-height:inherit;} Significant use of correction fluid cited among other ‘widespread, systematic and grave’ irregularities New vote to be held within 150 days, court says

Significant use of correction fluid cited among other ‘widespread, systematic and grave’ irregularities

New vote to be held within 150 days, court says