appConfigEntityId

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

hooksArticlePageAdvertisementConfigArticle

liveArticle

appConfig

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

paywallTypes

createdDate

publishedDate

sponsorType

urlAlias

moreOnThisArticles

sectionsV2

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

articleSpeeches

socialHeadline

headline

images

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

json

Agence France-Presse

Russia’s state-controlled television on Friday wheeled out conspiracy theories to explain the Malaysian air crash, including one holding that it was a bungled attempt to down President Vladimir Putin’s presidential jet.
After Putin said that Ukraine was responsible for the crash, Russian state television focused on several theories that pinned the blame accordingly.
“The aim could have been Plane No. 1,” Russia 24 television said, referring to Putin’s presidential jet, quoting an Interfax civil aviation source as saying the logo on the Malaysian plane’s wing “looks like the Russian tricolour.”
To back up the claim, it aired television footage of a hawkishly pro-NATO former Ukraine defence minister, Anatoliy Grytsenko, saying someone should kill Putin.
The president returned to Moscow on Thursday from a tour of Latin America, and his plane and the Malaysian liner both flew over eastern Europe at roughly the same time, Channel One television noted.
 Television reports also centred on an alleged second plane that several witnesses said they saw at the scene.
Channel One cited a local resident who said she saw another plane fly off as the Malaysian jet burned on the ground.
“One plane fell and the second one flew over to the side, towards Dnipropetrovsk,” she said.
“It’s possible that in (her) words is the solution to the mystery,” Channel One’s news anchor said, suggesting that the second plane was involved in the liner’s crash.

She said the second plane could have been a Ukrainian armed forces plane which was then downed by the rebels shortly afterwards.
“So far we don’t know where the plane is and what happened to the pilot. Local residents said they saw a person parachuting down in the area of the tragedy,” she said.
Casting doubt on Ukraine’s suggestion that the rebels were behind the crash, Channel One stressed that the Kiev authorities “fully control the situation in the air.”
It also suggested that Ukraine’s announcement of a terrorist attack came suspiciously soon after the event.
“It’s not possible to find out so quickly where, what and why. That means they shot it down themselves,” Channel One quoted a test pilot, Ruben Yesayan, as saying.
	  
	Almost all Russian newspapers carried photos of the crash on the front page on Friday, although state daily Rossiiskaya Gazeta led with a survey into Russians’ eating habits.
The pro-Kremlin tabloid Tvoi Den splashed a full-page cover photo of the crash scene with a line reading: “Donetsk People’s Republic Authorities Claim Plane Destroyed by Ukrainian Buk Missile,” an anti-aircraft system.
It quoted a member of the Donetsk rebels’ security council, Sergei Kavtaradze, as saying that “according to our information this plane was shot down by Ukrainian armed forces.”
The Izvestia daily, also pro-Kremlin, reported a rebel claim that the disaster was “a planned provocation by Kiev.” The newspaper referred to eastern Ukraine as “Novorossiya”, or New Russia as some separatists do.
Rebel leaders were quoted in Izvestia as saying the rebels controlling the area of the crash did not have weapons as sophisticated as the Buk to down the airliner.
“Judge for yourself, who could have done it? The rebels don’t have weapons that you could use to shoot down a plane at such an altitude, but Kiev does,” added Konstantin Dolgov, the co-chairman of the “Novorossiya” people’s front.

A Ukrainian military expert, Igor Levchenko, told the Kommersant business daily that Kiev did have several Buk missile systems in the conflict zone, but that “they definitely would not be used against such a target as a passenger liner.”
Some media questioned why a civilian plane had been allowed to fly over a conflict zone.
Kommersant cited aviation sources as saying that flying across eastern Ukraine was “reckless”, even at 10,000 metres (33,000 feet), and said Ukraine should have banned all flights over the area.
“It remains unclear how a Boeing 777 came to be above a conflict zone and why air traffic controllers didn’t prevent a potentially dangerous situation,”  wrote Rossiiskaya Gazeta.


Russia challenges ruling over Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 downing

Malaysia’s king to make historic Russia state visit at Putin’s invitation

279 bodies found at Air India crash site, making it second worst air disaster this century

Putin’s ‘second wife’ joke about Malaysia’s Anwar draws laughs and anger amid MH17 ruling

Malaysia Airlines flight 17

Russia airs conspiracy theories over downed Malaysia jet MH17

People walk in Lviv, passing a newsstand with newspaper depicting flight MH17. Photo: AFP

A man reads a newspaper in Kiev on July 18, 2014, with the front page depicting the plane crash. Photo: AFP

People lay flowers and light candles to commemorate passengers of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17. Photo: AFP

What is known about the Malaysian Airlines plane crash in Ukraine

Debris of the Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 Boeing 777, which came down over eastern Ukraine near Donetsk on Thursday. Photo: EPA

Timeline: The tragic history of civilian airliners shot down since the cold war

Debris of the Boeing 777, Malaysia Arilines flight MH17, which crashed during flying over the eastern Ukraine region near Donetsk, Ukraine

File photo of debris from the Itavia airliner at a military base in Rome. Photo: AP

Cathay Pacific VR-HEU were shot down by Chinese PLA Air Force. Photo: SCMP Pictures

Somali men pointed 24 March 2007 to the wreckage of a Belarussian cargo plane that was shot down by insurgents over Mogadishu 23 March 2007 during a third straight day of clashes with Ethiopian troops propping up the Somali government.  Photo: AFP

Antonov An-24RV. Photo: SCMP Pictures

Locater map depicting Iran Air 655 crash. Photo: SCMP Pictures

A CIA map shows divergence of planned and actual flight paths.

Russian fighter jets shot down the Boeing 707-321B plane from Paris to Seoul after it entered Soviet airspace. Photo: SCMP Pictures

(Click to enlarge) The frontpage of a local newspaper on September 4, 1978 with stories on the loss of an Air Rhodesia plane which was later confirmed to have been shot down by guerrillas. Photo: SCMP Pictures

An illustration of the Libyan Airlines' Boeing 727 flying over Sinai accompanied by two Israeli jet fighters. Photo: SCMP Pictures

News

World

Some claim that the crash was 'a bungled attempt to down President Putin's presidential jet'


Russia airs conspiracy theories over downed Malaysia jet MH17

.css-1c6uqr6{color:inherit;font-weight:inherit;font-size:inherit;font-family:inherit;line-height:inherit;overflow-wrap:break-word;}Some claim that the crash was 'a bungled attempt to down President Putin's presidential jet'

Some claim that the crash was 'a bungled attempt to down President Putin's presidential jet'