Puerto Rico governor fears US is back-pedalling on autonomy

Puerto Rico Governor Alejandro Garcia Padilla has denounced what he is calling a change in the US government’s historic position on the island’s political status.

In a letter to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, portions of which were released Sunday by the governor’s office, Garcia Padilla said the new stance contradicts the US past position that the autonomy Puerto Rico gained through the approval of its 1952 constitution should remove it from the UN’s list of non-self-governing territories.

“I believe it is my moral obligation to defend and to clarify the historic record, not only before us, but before the courts, the United States and the international community,” Garcia Padilla wrote.

Last week US Solicitor General Donald Verrilli filed a friend of the court brief arguing that Puerto Rico remains a territory under the powers of the US Congress despite the increased autonomy its constitution granted.

“Puerto Rico's transition to local self-government was a significant development in its relationship to the United States, and it has yielded many benefits for Puerto Rico and the United States in a relationship of mutual respect. Congress has evinced no intention to revoke the local autonomy it has vested in the government of Puerto Rico. But as a constitutional matter, Puerto Rico remains a territory subject to Congress's authority under the Territory Clause,” Verrilli stated in the brief.

The filing is in connection of a US Supreme Court review of a case that will determine if Puerto Rico, like the 50 states, can file local charges against people for crimes of which they have already been convicted by federal authorities. The answer centres on whether Puerto Rico is a “separate sovereign” for purposes of the US Constitution's Fifth Amendment Double Jeopardy clause. The Puerto Rico Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that the island is not a separate sovereign because Congress' decision to permit local self-government involved a “delegation of powers” not a “transfer of sovereignty.”