image

Antarctica

Antarctica’s ecological future in doubt as China, Russia and Norway pour cold water on plans for landmark reserve

  • The three nations helped block the proposal for a 1.8 million sq km (695,000 square mile) reserve
  • The reserve was supported by 22 other members of the body set up to protect Antarctic waters
PUBLISHED : Saturday, 03 November, 2018, 5:43am
UPDATED : Saturday, 03 November, 2018, 8:27pm

A plan to turn a huge tract of pristine Antarctic Ocean into the world’s biggest sanctuary has been rejected, throwing the future of one of the Earth’s most important ecosystems into doubt.

Environmental groups said Russia, China and Norway had played a part in blocking the proposal, with the other 22 members of the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, the organisation set up to protect Antarctic waters, backing the proposal.

The 1.8 million sq km 695,000 square mile) reserve – five times the size of Germany – would have banned all fishing in a vast area of the Weddell Sea and parts of the Antarctic peninsula, safeguarding species including penguins, killer whales, leopard seals and blue whales.

Experts said it would also have played a key role in tackling climate change, as the seas around the Antarctic soak up huge amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. But following days of talks in Hobart in Tasmania, the CCAMLR rejected the plan, which needed unanimous agreement to pass.

China to begin building first permanent airfield in Antarctica

Environmental groups, who had mobilised 2 million people in support of the plan, reacted with dismay.

“This was a historic opportunity to create the largest protected area on earth in the Antarctic: safeguarding wildlife, tackling climate change and improving the health of our global oceans,” said Frida Bengtsson of Greenpeace’s Protect the Antarctic campaign.

“Twenty-two delegations came here to negotiate in good faith but, instead, serious scientific proposals for urgent marine protection were derailed by interventions which barely engaged with the science.”

Perfectly rectangular iceberg floating off Antarctica looks deliberately cut

She said that rather than put forward “reasoned opposition on scientific grounds, some delegations, like China and Russia, instead deployed delaying tactics such as wrecking amendments and filibustering, which meant there was barely any time left for real discussion about protecting Antarctic waters”.

This was a historic opportunity to create the largest protected area on earth in the Antarctic … instead, serious scientific proposals for urgent marine protection were derailed
Frida Bengtsson, Greenpeace

CCAMLR did not respond to requests for comment but a report on its website said on Friday that there had been “much discussion” around plans for new ocean sanctuaries, adding: “members will continue to work intersessionally on proposals for these [sanctuaries] before they are again considered at next year’s meeting.”

The failure to create new protected zones in the Antarctic Ocean comes amid increasing evidence of humans’ devastating impact. This week leading scientists warned that people have wiped out 60% of wild animal populations since 1970, with potentially devastating consequences for the future of humanity.

Last month the UN warned there were only 12 years left to prevent climate catastrophe.

The UK government has backed a proposal to ensure 30 per cent of the world’s oceans are protected by 2030 – a move heralded as a breakthrough moment by environmentalists.

The UK environment secretary, Michael Gove, had said he was “fully behind” the creation of the Antarctic sanctuary, which he said would be a key moment in the effort to protecting the world’s oceans.

But following the decision on Friday, Greenpeace said CCAMLR had failed in its remit to protect the Antarctic waters. Bengtsson said: “We’re running out of time and scientists are clear that we need to create marine sanctuaries across at least 30 per cent of our oceans by 2030, to protect wildlife, ensure food security for billions and help to tackle climate change.”

She said that although the scientific evidence was clear “diplomatic efforts seem to be more concerned with expanding fisheries than with conservation”.

She said that meant it was more urgent than ever for the public to join the fight and put pressure on politicians to safe the oceans before it was too late.

“If bodies like the Antarctic Ocean Commission continue to fail in their mandate to conserve the ocean, they’re clearly unfit for purpose and aren’t part of the solution. Instead we must look to the historic negotiations taking place at the UN towards a Global Ocean Treaty.”