-
Advertisement
WorldEurope

How the trauma of Iraq war continues to shape British foreign policy 13 years after invasion

Experts argue Iraq mission has had a paralysing effect and accuse Britain of having a “non-policy” in Syria for many years

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
A British gunner in Helmand Province, Afghanistan. Photo: Heathcliff O'Malley / Rex Features
Agence France-Presse

Britain’s war in Iraq, to be examined in a major report due out Wednesday, instilled a deep sense of distrust towards military intervention that still casts a shadow over foreign policy, analysts say.

The decision to join the US-led invasion in 2003 on the basis of flawed intelligence, the occupation and Iraq’s bloody descent into sectarian violence, have been examined in detail by the Chilcot inquiry, which found the war was mounted on flawed intelligence, was executed with “wholly inadequate” planning, and ended “a long way from success”.
You can trace directly the reluctance of the British government to have boots on the ground in Libya or Syria to the experience in Iraq
Malcolm Chalmers, RUSI think tank

The experience, including the deaths of 179 British soldiers and tens of thousands of Iraqis, has already left its scars – on both sides of the Atlantic.

Advertisement

“It has defined Britain’s security policy,” said Malcolm Chalmers, deputy director general of the RUSI think tank. “You can trace directly the reluctance of the British government to have boots on the ground in Libya or Syria to the experience in Iraq.”

With France, Britain initiated efforts for a Nato-led no-fly zone during the uprising against Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi in 2011 – but the mission was limited.

Advertisement

It is also conducting air strikes against Islamic State (IS) in Iraq and Syria, but only after the House of Commons first voted against the mission in Syria in 2013.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x