-
Advertisement
Art
WorldEurope

Da Vinci scholar Matthew Landrus challenges attribution of record $450 million work

It wasn’t Leonardo da Vinci who painted Salvator Mundi, an Oxford historian claims, but an assistant whose work sells for far less

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
A Christies employee poses with ‘Salvator Mundi’, which is attributed to Leonardo da Vinci. But an Oxford historian disputes the claim. Photo: AP
The Guardian

Months after the painting Salvator Mundi sold for a record-breaking US$450 million (£335 million), a leading Oxford art historian is challenging its attribution to Leonardo da Vinci.

Matthew Landrus, a Leonardo scholar, believes most of the painting is by the artist’s studio assistant Bernardino Luini, whose own work generally sells for less than £1 million.

“This is a Luini painting,” Landrus said. “By looking at the various versions of Leonardo’s students’ works, one can see that Luini paints just like that work you see in the Salvator Mundi.”

Advertisement

He said between 5 per cent and 20 per cent of the painting was by Leonardo, and that Luini was the “primary painter”.

The picture of Jesus gesturing with his right hand while holding a crystal orb in his left, was sold last November by Christie’s New York as “one of fewer than 20 known paintings by Leonardo”.

Advertisement
The Louvre Abu Dhabi Museum. Photo: AFP
The Louvre Abu Dhabi Museum. Photo: AFP
Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x