Europe’s refugee crisis

Denmark plans to banish unwanted migrants on remote Lindholm Island that was used to quarantine sick farm animals

  • The controversial plan calls for Lindholm Island to be decontaminated before housing rejected asylum seekers in 2021
  • Human rights activists say the proposal is degrading and inhumane
PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 05 December, 2018, 1:51am
UPDATED : Wednesday, 05 December, 2018, 3:03am

A pro-government lawmaker acknowledged Tuesday that Danish plans to banish rejected asylum seekers or those with a criminal record to a remote island may breach international law – but added that his party doesn’t mind “challenging [international] conventions.”

Martin Henriksen of the anti-immigration Danish People’s Party, which supports Denmark’s centre-right government, said the government’s move “is a signal to the world that Denmark is not attractive” for migrants.

The isolated island of Lindholm was until this summer a laboratory facility for the state veterinary institute researching contagious animal diseases.

From 1926 until earlier this year, cattle and pigs suspected of having contagious diseases were isolated on the island, some 80km (50 miles) south of Copenhagen, to be tested.

Denmark plans to confiscate refugees’ valuables, drawing comparison to Nazi Germany

The plan, adopted Friday by the government and the Danish People’s Party that between them hold a majority in parliament, is to decontaminate the uninhabited island by late 2019 and open facilities for some 100 people in 2021.

The facilities would house migrants who have been denied asylum but cannot be deported, and those with criminal records.

Human rights activists have denounced the decision, calling it degrading and inhumane.

We demand that the government and the Danish People’s Party stop their plans [for the island] and improve the conditions for all rejected asylum seekers in Denmark
Steen D. Hartmann of Stop Diskrimination

“We demand that the government and the Danish People’s Party stop their plans [for the island] and improve the conditions for all rejected asylum seekers in Denmark,” said Steen D. Hartmann of the online movement Stop Diskrimination.

Denmark has two deportation centres – north of Copenhagen and in western Denmark – which Hartmann called “inhumane and terrible.”

Henriksen, an immigration hardliner, said Denmark’s decision was somewhat inspired by Australia, which is paying neighbouring Pacific island nations to hold asylum seekers who have attempted to reach Australian shores.

In recent years, Denmark has tightened its laws for immigrants, extending from one year to three the period that family members must wait before they can join a refugee in Denmark, reducing benefits for asylum seekers, shortening temporary residence permits and stepping up efforts to deport those whose applications are rejected.

The human cost of Australia’s offshore detention centres

In 2016, a law allowed the country’s authorities to seize valuables from migrants to help finance the costs of their stay. Danish citizens also must sell valuables worth more than 10,000 kroner (US$1,520) before they can receive any government welfare benefits.