Advertisement
Advertisement
Coronavirus pandemic: All stories
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
People sunbathe in a park on Lake Malar in Stockholm on June 24. Sweden has never banned gatherings or enforced the use of face masks during the pandemic. Photo: Reuters

Sweden’s anti-lockdown coronavirus expert says he’s ‘willing to reconsider’ face masks

  • Anders Tegnell has repeatedly made international headlines since advising against a full lockdown of the Scandinavian country
  • He has so far argued against the WHO’s recommendation to use face masks, saying there’s ‘very little scientific evidence’ that they work
The scientist behind Sweden’s controversial Covid-19 strategy said he is willing to reconsider using face masks, after previously advising against them.
Anders Tegnell, Sweden’s state epidemiologist and the architect of its hands-off response to the coronavirus pandemic, said there are situations in which it might be advisable for people to cover their mouths and noses.

Sweden’s coronavirus consensus cracks as deaths top 5,000

Face masks are “possibly” to be recommended for people using public transport, Tegnell said in an interview with Dagens Industri on Thursday. “We need to think about that more.” But masks “definitely won’t become an optimal solution in any way”, he said.

Tegnell has so far argued against the World Health Organisation’s recommendation to use face masks when social distancing as hard to do, with the justification that there’s “very little scientific evidence” they work.
Sweden’s state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell. Photo: AFP

The Swedish epidemiologist has repeatedly made international headlines since advising against a full lockdown.

On Wednesday, Tegnell once again spoke out against severe lockdowns as an appropriate response to the virus, calling imposing such severe restrictions despite the societal costs “madness”.

Sweden’s Covid-19 expert calls global lockdowns ‘madness’

“It was as if the world had gone mad, and everything we had discussed was forgotten,” he said in a podcast with Swedish Radio. “The cases became too many and the political pressure got too strong. And then Sweden stood there rather alone.”

Tegnell has admitted he misjudged the deadly potential of the coronavirus in its early stages, but has refused to consider abandoning his strategy. He says restricting movement to the radical extent seen across much of the globe can create other problems, including increased domestic abuse, loneliness and mass unemployment.

People enjoy a balmy evening on a quayside in Stockholm on June 24. Sweden never banned public gatherings amid the coronavirus pandemic. Photo: EPA

“In the same way that all drugs have side effects, measures against a pandemic also have negative effects,” he said. “At an authority like ours, which works with a broad spectrum of public health issues, it is natural to take these aspects into account.”

Instead of closing schools, shops and restaurants, Sweden left pretty much everything open. Citizens were encouraged to observe social distancing guidelines, but the strategy assumed Swedes would voluntarily alter their behaviour without the need for laws.

The country now has one of the world’s highest Covid-19 mortality rates, with more deaths per 100,000 than the US, according to Johns Hopkins University data.

In his comments to Dagens Industri, Tegnell said Swedes should continue to observe social distancing guidelines, such as working from home if possible, and avoiding public transport.

“I think we will have to keep living a little differently for a good while,” he said.

This article appeared in the South China Morning Post print edition as: Scientist critical of masks has a rethink
Post