Prince Harry wins first stage in libel suit against UK newspaper
- The suit is for a tabloid’s coverage of a separate action Harry filed to force authorities to provide police protection for him and his family when in the UK
- The British government withdrew round-the-clock protection when Harry and his wife, Meghan, gave up front-line royal duties and moved to California
Prince Harry won the first stage of a libel suit against the publisher of Britain’s Mail on Sunday newspaper as a judge ruled on Friday that parts of a story about his fight for police protection in the UK were defamatory.
High Court Justice Matthew Nicklin hasn’t yet considered issues such as whether the story was accurate or in the public interest, defences that the newspaper will most likely be able to offer in the next phase of the proceedings.
The suit revolves around the newspaper’s coverage of a separate High Court action Harry filed in an effort to force authorities to provide police protection for the prince and his family when they are in the UK. The government withdrew the family’s round-the-clock protection when Harry and his wife, Meghan, gave up front-line royal duties and moved to California.
On February 20, The Mail on Sunday reported that Harry sought a “far-reaching confidentiality order” to keep the details of his action against the government secret.
Prince Charles denies wrongdoing in bags-of-cash claim
Despite public statements by his spin doctors that the prince had always been willing to pay for police protection, that offer wasn’t made in his initial bid to overturn the government’s decision, the newspaper said.
Harry claims that The Mail on Sunday libelled him when it suggested that the prince lied in his initial public statements about the suit against the government and that he “cynically” tried to confuse the public by authorising his representatives to put out “false and misleading statements” about his willingness to pay for police protection.
Nicklin ruled that “natural or ordinary meaning” of the article was defamatory. But he stressed that the decision didn’t apply to other issues in the case.
“This is very much the first phase in a libel claim,” the judge wrote in his decision. “The next step will be for the defendant to file a defence to the claim. It will be a matter for determination later in the proceedings whether the claim succeeds or fails, and if so on what basis.”
