appConfigEntityId

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

hooksArticlePageAdvertisementConfigArticle

liveArticle

appConfig

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

paywallTypes

createdDate

publishedDate

sponsorType

urlAlias

moreOnThisArticles

sectionsV2

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

articleSpeeches

socialHeadline

headline

images

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

json

Agence France-Presse

Initial findings of an investigation led by the United Arab Emirates of May 12 attacks on oil tankers point to the likelihood that a state was behind the bombings, but there is no evidence yet that Iran was involved, the UAE said on Thursday.
The UAE along with Saudi Arabia and Norway presented the preliminary findings during a briefing to the UN Security Council, which will also receive the final results of the probe to consider a possible response.
The US has accused Iran of being behind the attacks on the four oil tankers off the Emirati coast, which came at a time of escalating tensions between Tehran and Washington.
The four vessels – two Saudi-flagged, a Norwegian-flagged and an Emirati-flagged – were damaged by explosions that took place within UAE territorial waters, off the port of Fujairah.
Iran ‘almost certainly’ behind oil tanker attacks, Bolton claims
After assessing the damage and carrying out chemical analysis, the UAE told the council that the attacks were sophisticated and of the type most likely carried out by state services.
“While investigations are still ongoing, these facts are strong indications that the four attacks were part of a sophisticated and coordinated operation carried out by an actor with significant operational capacity, most likely a state actor,” said a statement from the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Norway.




The initial findings showed that it was “highly likely” that four Limpet mines, which are magnetically attached to a ship’s hull, were used in the attacks, placed by trained divers, who were deployed from fast boats, according to the preliminary findings.
The UAE believes the attacks required intelligence capabilities to pick the four oil tankers as targets, one of which – a Saudi ship – was at the opposite end of the anchorage area at Fujairah from the three other tankers.
Iran has rejected accusations that it was behind the sabotage and diplomats said there was no mention of Iran’s possible role during the briefing by the UAE.
Saudi Arabia, Iran’s arch-rival, told reporters that Tehran was nevertheless the most likely culprit.
“We believe the responsibility for this attack lies on the shoulders of Iran,” Saudi Arabia’s UN Ambassador Abdallah al-Mouallimi told reporters after the briefing.
Saudi oil tankers hit by ‘sabotage attacks’ as Gulf tensions soar
Saudi Arabia maintains the attacks affect the safety of international navigation and the security of world oil supplies, requiring a response from the Security Council.
Russia’s Deputy Ambassador Vladimir Safronkov told reporters after the closed-door briefing that no evidence was presented linking Iran to the attacks.
“We shouldn’t jump to conclusions,” Safronkov said. “This investigation will be continued.”
UN diplomats said that any attempt at the council to punish Iran for the attacks is likely to face opposition from Russia.

US National Security Advisor John Bolton said last week that Iranian mines were likely used in the attacks.
“There’s no doubt in anybody’s mind in Washington who’s responsible for this,” Bolton said last week during a visit to Abu Dhabi.
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said that Iran was trying to raise the price of oil as Washington works to end Tehran’s exports of crude.
Regional tensions have spiked since President Donald Trump’s administration reimposed sanctions against Iran after the US pulled out of the Iran nuclear deal.
The US has sent nuclear-capable bombers and an aircraft carrier strike group to the Gulf, but Trump has said he does not want war.


China’s calls to open Hormuz show the limits of its ties to Iran, experts say

UAE to exit Opec, dealing blow to oil cartel’s unity

Austria Islamic State man admits plot on Taylor Swift concert in Vienna

Trump demands firing of Kimmel over ‘expectant widow’ joke

Saudi Arabia

‘State actor’ behind attacks on Gulf oil tankers, UAE tells UN

The Al Marzoqah oil tanker was attacked on May 12 outside the Fujairah port. Photo: EPA-EFE

An undated photograph provided June 6, 2019 by the United Arab Emirates mission to the United Nations shows underwater damage to the Saudi Arabian tanker Al Marzoqah in the Port of Fujairah. UAE Mission/Handout via REUTERS. ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS IMAGE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY. NO RESALES. NO ARCHIVES.

News

World

Middle East

The four vessels were damaged by explosions that took place within UAE territorial waters
The US has accused Iran of being behind the attacks on the tankers


The four vessels were damaged by explosions that took place within UAE territorial waters.


Iran

United Nations

‘State actor’ behind attacks on Gulf oil tankers, UAE tells UN

.css-1mniedq{color:inherit;font-weight:inherit;font-size:inherit;font-family:inherit;line-height:inherit;}The four vessels were damaged by explosions that took place within UAE territorial waters The US has accused Iran of being behind the attacks on the tankers

The four vessels were damaged by explosions that took place within UAE territorial waters

The US has accused Iran of being behind the attacks on the tankers