Advertisement
Advertisement
Vladimir Putin
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Russian President Vladimir Putin gestures as he speaks during a meeting with opposition candidates who ran against him in Sunday’s presidential election. Putin has expressed a wish to dial down international tensions despite inflammatory rhetoric before the election. Photo: Pool via AP

Putin says he doesn’t want an arms race, striking softer tone after landslide re-election

Despite warning of a hypersonic missile that could strike the US prior to the election, Putin - who won more than 75 per cent of the vote - took a softer tack on Monday

Russian President Vladimir Putin struck a softer tone towards the West on Monday after winning his biggest ever election victory, saying he sought conciliation, not conflict.

Putin, 65, used a Kremlin meeting with the candidates he soundly defeated in Sunday’s election to signal his desire to focus on domestic matters, and to try to raise living standards by investing more in education, infrastructure and health while reducing defence spending.

“Nobody plans to accelerate an arms race,” said Putin. “We will do everything to resolve all the differences with our partners using political and diplomatic channels.”

Putin’s victory, which comes at a time when his relations with the West are on a hostile trajectory, will extend his political dominance of Russia by six years to 2024.

That will make him the longest-serving ruler since Soviet dictator Josef Stalin, and has raised Western fears of spiralling confrontation - fears that he now seems to want to quell.

Putin’s comments, which are likely to be heard with some scepticism in the West following years of confrontation, mark a change in tone after a bellicose election campaign during which he unveiled new nuclear weapons he said could strike almost any point in the world.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel wished Putin success and called for more dialogue. But Russia is currently at odds with the West over Syria and Ukraine; allegations of cyberattacks and meddling in foreign elections; and the poisoning in Britain of a former Russian spy and his daughter. 

As a result, relations with the West have hit a post-Cold-War low.

With nearly 100 per cent of the votes counted, the Central Election Commission (CEC), announced that Putin, who has run Russia as president or prime minister since 1999, had won 76.69 per cent of the vote.

With more than 56 million votes, it was Putin’s biggest ever win and the largest by any post-Soviet Russian leader.

Supporters of Vladimir Putin, Russia's president, hold up a poster during celebrations at a rally near the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, on March 18, 2018. Photo: Bloomberg

But the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), a rights watchdog, said restrictions on fundamental freedoms, as well as on candidate registration, had restricted the scope for political engagement and crimped competition.

“Choice without real competition, as we have seen here, is not real choice,” the OSCE said in a statement.

The CEC said earlier on Monday it had not registered any serious complaints of violations.

Backed by state TV and the ruling party, and credited with an approval rating of around 80 per cent, Putin faced no credible threat from a field of seven challengers.

His nearest rival, Communist Party candidate Pavel Grudinin, won 11.8 per cent, while nationalist Vladimir Zhirinovsky got 5.6 per cent. His most vocal opponent, anti-corruption campaigner Alexei Navalny, was barred from running.

Navalny, who had called on voters to boycott the election, urged his supporters not to lose heart and said his campaign had succeeded in lowering the turnout, accusing authorities of being forced to falsify the numbers.

Near-final figures put turnout at 67.7 per cent, just shy of the 70 per cent the Kremlin was reported to have been aiming for before the vote.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov played down suggestions that tensions with the West had boosted turnout, saying the result showed that Russians were united behind Putin’s plans to develop the country.

He said Putin would spend the day fielding calls of congratulation, meeting supporters, and holding talks with the losing candidates.

Chinese President Xi Jinping was among the first to offer his congratulations to Putin, but Heiko Maas, Germany’s new foreign minister, questioned whether there had been fair political competition.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel later told Putin: “It is more important than ever that we pursue dialogue and promote relations between our countries and peoples,” according to a German government statement.

Putin also spoke to French President Emmanuel Macron and Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan by phone.

Macron wished Russia and its people success in modernising the country, while Erdogan spoke with Putin about joint efforts by Moscow and Ankara to resolve the Syria crisis.

A White House spokesman said the United States was not surprised by the outcome of the election and no phone call was scheduled between Putin and US President Donald Trump.

Russian President Vladimir Putin meets with co-chairs of his campaign headquarters in the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, on March 19, 2018. Now that Vladimir Putin has overwhelmingly won re-election for another six years in power, some are wondering whether he will try to stay in power for life. Photo: AP 

How long Putin wants to stay in power remains uncertain.

The constitution limits the president to two successive terms, obliging him to step down at the end of his new mandate.

Asked after his re-election if he would run for yet another term in the future, Putin laughed off the idea.

“Let’s count. What, do you think I will sit (in power) until I’m 100 years old?” he said, calling the question “funny”.

Although Putin has six years to consider a possible successor, uncertainty about his future is a potential source of instability in a fractious ruling elite that only he can keep in check.

“The longer he stays in power, the harder it will be to exit,” said Andrei Kolesnikov, senior fellow at the Carnegie Moscow Centre, a think-tank.

“How can he abandon such a complicated system, which is essentially his personal project?” 

Post