Explainer | How the West could use Swift finance system to punish Russia for Ukraine attack
- US and European leaders are considering cutting Russia off from the network, which would cripple its ability to trade with most of the world
- But such a move could also spur Moscow to accelerate the development of an alternative transfer system, with China for example
.png?itok=arIb17P0)
An exclusion from Swift, a very discreet but important cog in the machinery of international finance, is one of the most disruptive of the possible sanctions that the West could deploy against Russia for its invasion of Ukraine.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky called Thursday for such a move after Russian forces invaded his country, as Western powers consider imposing additional sanctions on Moscow.
The White House has pointedly refused in recent weeks to exclude the possibility of barring Russia from the international system that banks use to transfer money, a move that would cripple Russia’s ability to trade with most of the world.
European leaders discussed the measure as one possible option at their emergency summit on Thursday. Asked about Swift earlier, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said: “We need to keep sanctions ready for later times.”
01:39
British PM Boris Johnson calls Putin a ‘dictator’ and warns of ‘massive’ sanctions from the West
What is Swift?
Founded in 1973, the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, or Swift, actually does not handle any transfers of funds itself.
But its messaging system, developed in the 1970s to replace relying upon Telex machines, provides banks the means to communicate rapidly, securely and inexpensively.
The non-listed, Belgium-based firm is actually a cooperative of banks and proclaims to remain neutral.
Banks use the Swift system to send standardised messages about transfers of sums between themselves, transfers of sums for clients, and buy and sell orders for assets.
Who uses Swift?
More than 11,000 financial institutions in over 200 countries use Swift, making it the backbone of the international financial transfer system.
But its pre-eminent role in finance has also meant that the firm has had to cooperate with authorities to prevent the financing of terrorism.
According to the national association Rosswift, Russia is the second-largest country following the United States in terms of the number of users, with some 300 Russian financial institutions belonging to the system.
More than half of Russia’s financial institutions are members of Swift, it added.
Russia does have its own domestic financial infrastructure, including the SPFS system for bank transfers and the Mir system for card payments, similar to the Visa and Mastercard systems.
01:19
Ukrainian city of Kharkiv wakes up to the sound of explosions
What are the consequences of exclusion?
In November 2019, Swift “suspended” access to its network by certain Iranian banks.
The move followed the imposition of sanctions on Iran by the United States and threats by then Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin that Swift would be targeted by US sanctions if it did not comply.
Iran had already been disconnected from the Swift network from 2012 to 2016.
Tactically, “the advantages and disadvantages are debatable”, said Guntram Wolff, director of the Brussels-based Bruegel think tank.
In practical terms, being removed from Swift means Russian banks cannot use it to make or receive payments with foreign financial institutions for trade transactions.
“Operationally it would be a real headache,” Wolff said, especially for European countries which have considerable trade with Russia, which is their single biggest supplier of natural gas.
Western nations threatened to exclude Russia from Swfit in 2014 following its annexation of Crimea.
But excluding such a major country – Russia is also a major oil exporter – could spur Moscow to accelerate the development of an alternative transfer system, with China for example.
