Advertisement
Advertisement
Donald Trump
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
The electoral college was devised at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. It was a compromise meant to strike a balance between those who wanted popular elections for president and those who wanted no public input. Photo: AP

Confused by America’s voting system? Welcome to the club

Donald Trump

A native of East India, Dr. Rachakonda Prabhu is having a hard time explaining the United States electoral college to his friends around the world.

The 69-year-old Las Vegas physician is one of Nevada’s six Democratic presidential electors who will ceremonially cast their ballots for Hillary Clinton on Monday at the state Capitol in Carson City.

Clinton carried the western swing state and won the most votes at the polls nationally in the November election. But GOP President-elect Donald Trump’s big upsets in Midwest battleground states helped him claim the most electoral votes, 306-232.

It baffles Prabhu’s international colleagues.

“They are shocked and surprised that somebody could lose the popular vote by 2.5 million and still win the election,” he said. “They just don’t understand that.”

“I tell them it’s an old system established by the Founding Fathers,” said the longtime friend of retiring Democrat Senator Harry Reid. “I tell them it was good when it was working for the last 200 years. But it might be time for a change.”

New York State electoral college members cast votes at the state capital in Albany, New York in 1940. The nation’s founding fathers set up the electoral college to ensure a well-informed, geographically diverse group of electors would choose the nation’s presidents. Photo: AP

Prabhu — a regular contributor to Democratic candidates who also sometimes gives to GOP campaigns — backed Clinton from the start, as did two other Nevada electors. The other three supported Bernie Sanders in the February caucuses.

The diverse group includes:

A retired African-American woman from Minden.

A Hispanic state assemblywoman from Reno.

A retired union worker from rural Fallon.

A 22-year-old Las Vegan who recently graduated from the University of Nevada, Reno.

An IT specialist at University of Nevada who helped craft databases to pinpoint precincts statewide with the biggest potential for Sanders.

“I ended up voting for Hillary, but I didn’t put a lot of energy into getting her elected — not like I did with Sanders, in any way, shape or form,” said Greg Gardella, 52, the technology manager at UNR.

Paul Catha, past president of Nevada’s Young Democrats, still believes Sanders was “the right candidate.” But the University of Nevada grad ended up working for months as a party field organiser for Clinton, seven days a week, sometimes 18 hours a day.

“It’s a little bittersweet, but we carried Nevada,” Catha said.

Unlike some states where anti-Trump forces are trying to persuade electors to abandon him, Nevada law requires they adhere to statewide results. If they don’t, the secretary of state must reject their ballots and appoint replacements, repeating the procedure if necessary until it’s done legally.

“I’ve had people who I knew from the Sanders campaign suggest I vote for him, but it was always jokingly,” said Catha, who’s looking forward to his next “college” assignment.

Larry Jackson of Fallon, a rural caucus representative on the state party’s executive board, liked Sanders’ platform and appeal to youth. But he’s anxious to cast his ballot for Clinton. Trump worries him more than any new president since Ronald Reagan, who he associates with high unemployment.

“I don’t believe he (Trump) is going to be for the working people,” said Jackson, 68. “He’s taking care of his financial interests and people of his income bracket. ”

Post