The US general who could stop Donald Trump launching a nuclear strike
General John Hyten, who is responsible for overseeing the US nuclear arsenal, explained the process that would follow a launch command
The top US nuclear commander said that he would resist President Donald Trump if he ordered an “illegal” launch of nuclear weapons.
Air Force General John Hyten, commander of the US Strategic Command (Stratcom), told an audience at the Halifax International Security Forum in Nova Scotia, Canada that he had given a lot of thought to what he would say if he received such an order.
“I think some people think we’re stupid,” Hyten said in response to a question about such a scenario. “We’re not stupid people. We think about these things a lot. When you have this responsibility, how do you not think about it?”
Hyten, who is responsible for overseeing the US nuclear arsenal, explained the process that would follow such a command.
As head of Stratcom “I provide advice to the president, he will tell me what to do,” he said in his remarks, retransmitted in a video posted on the forum’s Facebook page.
“And if it’s illegal, guess what’s going to happen? I’m going to say, ‘Mr. President, that’s illegal.’ And guess what he’s going to do? He’s going to say, ‘What would be legal?’ And we’ll come up with options, of a mix of capabilities to respond to whatever the situation is, and that’s the way it works. It’s not that complicated.”
Hyten said running through scenarios of how to react in the event of an illegal order was standard practice, and added: “If you execute an unlawful order, you will go to jail. You could go to jail for the rest of your life.”
The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Hyten’s remarks.
Trump issued an apocalyptic threat to unleash “fire and fury” on North Korea and began calling Kim Jong-un “Rocket Man” after a series of provocative missile tests, while the hermit state’s leader branded Trump a “dotard.”
The escalating war of words has alarmed some US lawmakers, and senators debated the limits of a president’s unilateral power to launch a nuclear attack last week.
In the event of an ongoing or imminent nuclear attack, senators and expert witnesses agreed that the president had full authority to defend the nation, but experts said there was no strict definition of “imminent”.
As to what constitutes an illegal order, Hyten referred to the four key principles from the Law of Armed Conflict in his remarks.
“The Law of Armed Conflict has certain principles – necessity, distinction, proportionality, unnecessary suffering – all those things are defined,” Hyten said.
Additional reporting by Agence France-Presse
