Advertisement
US Politics
WorldUnited States & Canada

Tone deaf? Trump’s environment chief illegally spent US$43,000 building soundproof booth in his office

EPA director Scott Pruitt had already come under fire for his big-spending ways

2-MIN READ2-MIN
FEnvironmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt speaks during an interview at his office in Washington on July 10, 2017. Photo: Reuters
Agence France-Presse

The US Environmental Protection Agency broke the law when it spent thousands of dollars building a soundproof booth in the office of its embattled director who was appointed by President Donald Trump, government investigators said Monday.

The non-partisan Government Accountability Office (GAO) determined the agency was wrong when it spent US$43,000 on the project without first consulting Congress, a decision that heaps pressure on EPA administrator Scott Pruitt, who is already in hot water over mounting ethics questions.

“EPA used its appropriations in a manner specifically prohibited by law,” GAO General Counsel Thomas Armstrong wrote in a letter to lawmakers.

Advertisement
Section 710 of a 2017 government appropriations act prohibits spending more than US$5,000 to furnish, redecorate or make improvements to an office of a presidential appointee without prior notification to Congress.
Embattle EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt, already under fire for lavish spending, illegally spent US$43,000 on a soundproof booth for his office. Photo: Bloomberg
Embattle EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt, already under fire for lavish spending, illegally spent US$43,000 on a soundproof booth for his office. Photo: Bloomberg

“We conclude that EPA violated Section 710 when it obligated US$43,238.68 for the installation of a soundproof privacy booth without providing advance notice to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate,” the letter said.

Advertisement

Pruitt has been under fire for his lavish spending on first-class travel and his large security detail, for a discount he received on an apartment rental linked to a lobbying firm, and for allegedly sharply boosting salaries of close aides at the EPA.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x