‘I’m not racist’: New York lawyer Aaron Schlossberg, who abused people for speaking Spanish, issues apology
Schlossberg, who threatened to have immigration authorities kick restaurant staff ‘out of my country’, said he loves diversity and the video does not depict ‘the real me’
The New York lawyer propelled to ignominy after a video showed him abusing people for having a conversation in Spanish in a Manhattan restaurant apologised on Tuesday in a brief statement, saying the video did not depict the “real me”.
Aaron Schlossberg said he regretted the hurt he had caused, apologised for the way he expressed himself, and said that he was not a racist, but stopped short of disavowing specifics about his remarks.
“To the people I insulted, I apologise,” Schlossberg wrote in a statement posted to Twitter and LinkedIn. “Seeing myself online opened my eyes – the manner in which I expressed myself is unacceptable and is not the person I am. I see my words and actions hurt people, and for that I am deeply sorry.”
He said that he loved New York for its diversity and “because of immigrants and the diversity of cultures immigrants bring to this country”.
“While people should be able to express themselves freely, they should do so calmly and respectfully,” Schlossberg wrote in his apology. “What the video did not convey is the real me. I am not racist.”
The video became a sensation on social media last week amid the polarising national debate about race, identity and immigration that has churned so loudly since US President Donald Trump’s election.
Schlossberg berated a manager at a deli in midtown Manhattan because staff were speaking Spanish to customers “when they should be speaking English,” he said. He threatened to call immigration enforcement authorities on the employees, alleging with no evidence beyond the language they were speaking that they were not legal residents of the country.
“My guess is they’re not documented, so my next call is to ICE to have each one of them kicked out of my country,” he said. “If they have the balls to come here and live off my money – I pay for their welfare. I pay for their ability to be here. The least they can do – the least they can do – is speak English.”
Schlossberg instantly became a subject of infamy on social media and in the news. Reporters in New York pursued him, confronting him as he hid under an umbrella, during an appearance at a courthouse, and on the street. But he declined to answer their questions or apologise for his statements. And video emerged that depicted him in previous heated political confrontations: cursing and yelling at an alt-right affiliated protest, yelling at demonstrators while wearing a “Make America great again,” hat in front of Trump Tower, and calling a stranger an “ugly f****** foreigner”.
And many noticed that his website notes that he speaks Spanish, and also has a phone service set up to serve potential clients in Spanish as well as other languages, an irony that was not lost on many commentators.
The lawyer who threatened to call immigration enforcement on workers at a Manhattan cafe earlier this week sprinted away from an NBC News reporter earlier today https://t.co/BCsW1WSWDG pic.twitter.com/rb5A6XZBXF
— NBC New York (@NBCNewYork) May 17, 2018
Schlossberg, whose website says he has an expertise in commercial and insurance law, was also targeted in a complaint filed by two Democratic elected officials, Representative Adriano Espaillat and Bronx Borough President Ruben Diaz Jnr, who said they believed as a lawyer, he deserved to be reprimanded by the court system for the behaviour depicted in the video.
The New York State Court’s rules of professional conduct stipulate that lawyers can face consequences for various types of misconduct, including engaging “in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice,” stating or implying an ability to improperly influence any legislative body or public official, discriminating in the hiring, promoting or determining of other employment issues in the practice of law, and engaging “in any other conduct that adversely reflects on the lawyer’s fitness as a lawyer.”