Tesla’s Elon Musk is sued by British caver in Thai rescue for calling him a paedophile

Vernon Unsworth sued over Elon Musk’s July 15 tweet referring to him as a ‘pedo guy’, a comment for which the Tesla CEO later apologised

PUBLISHED : Tuesday, 18 September, 2018, 5:01am
UPDATED : Tuesday, 18 September, 2018, 3:37pm

Elon Musk, the chief executive of Tesla, was sued for defamation on Monday for falsely suggesting that a British caver who helped rescue 12 boys and their soccer coach from a cave in Thailand in July was a paedophile and child rapist.

Vernon Unsworth, who lives north of London, sued over Musk’s July 15 tweet to more than 22 million followers referring to him as a “pedo guy”, a comment for which Musk later apologised. He also claimed that Musk falsely called him a child rapist and sex trafficker in an August 30 email to BuzzFeed News.

Unsworth is seeking at least US$75,000 of compensatory damages plus unspecified punitive damages in his complaint filed in the US District Court in Los Angeles.

Tesla did not immediately respond to requests for comment from Musk and the company.

The Hertfordshire resident said he also plans to file a second lawsuit with London’s High Court for reputational damage suffered in the United Kingdom.

Musk’s influence and wealth cannot convert his lies into truth or protect him from accountability.
L. Lin Wood, a lawyer for Vernon Unsworth

“Elon Musk falsely accused Vernon Unsworth of being guilty of heinous crimes,” L. Lin Wood, his a lawyer, said in a statement. “Musk’s influence and wealth cannot convert his lies into truth or protect him from accountability.”

The case adds to a slew of litigation against Musk, including over his running of Palo Alto, California-based Tesla.

Musk stunned investors last month with tweets saying he had “secured” funding to take his electric car company private in a buyout valued at US$72 billion, before backing off.

The billionaire’s behaviour has raised concerns about his corporate leadership, and several Wall Street analysts and some investors have urged Tesla to appoint a strong second-in-command. Musk has admitted to severe stress from running Tesla.

Unsworth said he has been exploring caves since 1971, when he was 16, and now shares a house in the Thai countryside near Chiang Rai with a 40-year-old woman who owns a nail salon.

SpaceX signs first tourist to fly around moon. Details are up in air

He said he became a target after cavers rejected Musk’s offer of a mini-submarine created by his rocket company SpaceX to rescue the soccer team which was freed from the cave on July 10 after an 18-day ordeal.

Though Unsworth told CNN three days later that Musk’s offer was a “PR stunt” that had no chance of working and that Musk could “stick his submarine where it hurts”, he said that did not justify Musk’s use of Twitter and the media to defame him.

The July 15 tweet by Musk touted the mini-submarine and then, referring to Unsworth with a shorthand description of paedophile, said, “Sorry pedo guy, you really did ask for it.”

Tesla rocked by Musk smoking marijuana on web show, executives quitting

Three days later, Musk defended his mini-submarine proposal, but said he had “spoken in anger” towards Unsworth, and “his actions against me do not justify my actions against him”, and that “the fault is mine and mine alone”.

But Unsworth said Musk urged in his August 30 email that a BuzzFeed reporter “stop defending child rapists”, and called him as “an old, single white guy From England” who moved to Chiang Rai, “renowned for child sex-trafficking”, to take a 12-year-old bride.

On August 29, Musk also questioned on Twitter why Unsworth had not yet sued him, seemingly implying that it was an indication of guilt.

Unsworth said he is not a paedophile, child rapist, child sex trafficker, husband of a 12-year-old bride, or liar, and that the defamatory statements “were manufactured out of whole cloth by Musk” because of the disagreement over the mini-submarine.

“On the surface, it appears that Mr Unsworth can assert the elements of defamation,” said Nancy Costello, director of the First Amendment Clinic at the Michigan State University College of Law, in an interview.

“Being called a paedophile can be defamation per se, meaning the claim could obviously damage his reputation,” she added.