image

US Politics

Donald Trump defends Brett Kavanaugh following latest allegation of sexual misconduct

Kavanaugh denies the incident occurred, calling it ‘a smear, plain and simple’

PUBLISHED : Monday, 24 September, 2018, 8:37am
UPDATED : Monday, 24 September, 2018, 10:45pm

US President Trump on Monday branded sexual assault allegations threatening to bring down his Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh “totally political”.

“There’s a chance that this could be one of the single most unfair, unjust things to happen to a candidate but I am with Judge Kavanaugh,” Trump said after he arrived in New York to attend the United Nations General Assembly. “In my opinion, it’s totally political.

“Judge Kavanaugh is an outstanding person. I am with him all the way.”

A second allegation of sexual misconduct has emerged against Judge Brett Kavanaugh, a development that has further imperilled his nomination to the Supreme Court, forced the White House and Senate Republicans onto the defensive and fuelled calls from Democrats to postpone further action on his confirmation.

The new accusation landed late on Sunday in a report from The New Yorker, just a few hours after negotiators had reached an agreement to hold an extraordinary public hearing Thursday for Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford, who accuses him of sexually assaulting her at a party when they were teenagers. Kavanaugh denies the claim.

As the White House defends Kavanaugh against the claims, presidential counsellor Kellyanne Conway told CBS on Monday that the accusations against Kavanaugh sound like “a vast left-wing conspiracy,” using rhetoric that echoed Hillary Clinton’s 1998 description of allegations that her husband, President Bill Clinton, had had affairs.

“I know there’s pent up demand for women to get their day, women who have been sexually harassed and sexually assaulted, and I personally am very aggrieved for all of them,” Conway said. “I just don’t think one man’s shoulders should bear decades of the #metoo movement.”

Trump was told about The New Yorker allegations Sunday in the hours before the piece’s explosive publication, according to a White House official not authorised to speak publicly about private conversations.

Trump cast doubt on the veracity and the timing of the piece, believing it was further proof of what he has been saying privately for days: that the Democrats and media were conspiring to undermine his pick. The president showed no initial sign of wanting to walk away from Kavanaugh and expressed frustration that the confirmation process has not moved more quickly.

I just don’t think one man’s shoulders should bear decades of the #metoo movement
Kellyanne Conway

The second claim against Kavanaugh dates to the 1983-84 academic year, which was his first at Yale University. Deborah Ramirez described the incident after being contacted by The New Yorker magazine. She recalled that Kavanaugh exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away.

In a statement provided by the White House, Kavanaugh said the event “did not happen” and that the allegation was “a smear, plain and simple”. A White House spokeswoman added in a second statement that the allegation was “designed to tear down a good man”.

Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, the senior Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, called for the “immediate postponement” of any further action on Kavanaugh’s nomination.

Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee said they would investigate Ramirez’s accusation. Taylor Foy, a Judiciary spokesman, complained that Democrats “actively withheld information” from the Republicans. He said they appear “more interested in a political takedown” than a bipartisan process.

The New Yorker said it contacted Ramirez after learning of a possible involvement in an incident with Kavanaugh. It said that the allegation came to the attention of Democratic senators through a civil rights lawyer. The Democrats then began investigating.

Ramirez was reluctant at first to speak publicly “partly because her memories contained gaps because she had been drinking at the time of the alleged incident,” The New Yorker reported. After “six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting her lawyer, Ramirez said that she felt confident enough of her recollections” to speak publicly, the report said.

Brett Kavanaugh’s accuser agrees to testify in Senate

Joining the maelstrom, Michael Avenatti, the lawyer representing porn actress Stormy Daniels in her legal fight with President Donald Trump, claimed to represent a woman with information about high school-era parties attended by Kavanaugh and urged the Senate to investigate. Avenatti said he will disclose his client’s identity in the coming days and that she is prepared to testify before the committee, as well as provide names of corroborating witnesses.

A White House official not authorised to speak publicly questioned the accusations coming from Avenatti’s client, saying that the presence of the high-profile lawyer – who has publicly taken on Trump and is weighing a 2020 Democratic presidential bid – makes the proceedings a “circus”.

The accusation from Ramirez raise the stakes further for a dramatic showdown on Thursday, as Kavanaugh and Ford testify in public about an incident she characterises as attempted rape – and that he says simply never happened.

Kavanaugh’s nomination hangs precariously. A handful of senators in both parties remain undecided on his nomination. Defections among Republicans would likely block his path to the Supreme Court.

The White House is approaching Ford’s potential testimony with trepidation, nervous that an emotional appearance might not just damage Kavanaugh’s chances but could further energise female voters to turn out against Republicans in November.

Still, the White House and Republicans have cast doubt on Ford’s allegations. The Judiciary panel said it had talked to three other people who Ford has told The Washington Post were at the party where the alleged assault took place – Mark Judge, Patrick J. Smyth and Leland Ingham Keyser. All three told investigators that they had no recollection of the evening in question, the committee said.

The Post reported Sunday that Keyser said in a brief interview at her home that she still believes Ford, even if she does not remember the party.

As he builds a case for his innocence, Kavanaugh plans to turn over to the committee calendars from the summer of 1982. Those calendars, he says, do not show a party consistent with Ford’s description of the gathering in which she says he attacked her, The New York Times reported Sunday. The calendars list basketball games, movie outings, football workouts, college interviews, and a few parties with names of friends other than those identified by Ford, according to the Times.