appConfigEntityId

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

hooksArticlePageAdvertisementConfigArticle

liveArticle

appConfig

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

paywallTypes

createdDate

publishedDate

sponsorType

urlAlias

moreOnThisArticles

sectionsV2

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

articleSpeeches

socialHeadline

headline

images

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

json

Tribune News Service

The passage of half a century has blurred many of the reasons that the United States was able to accomplish what seemed like science fiction: the July 20, 1969, landing of Apollo 11 on the moon.
The Apollo programme’s stunning technical success depended on a government leadership culture, an industrial organisation, a tolerance for risk and a political environment that do not exist today – even as Nasa insists it will land humans on the moon in five years.
Could it be duplicated?
“Lots of luck with that,” said Jay Honeycutt, an Apollo-era engineer in flight operations who later became chief of the Kennedy Space Centre in Florida.
“We could if they let us.”
Honeycutt was among more than a dozen Apollo-era leaders and contemporary space experts who agreed, in interviews, that changes in American society have made the idea of landing humans on the moon far more challenging now than it was 50 years ago.
“Technically it would be easier today, because we have more tools,” said Gerry Griffin, an Apollo-era flight director who later became chief of the Johnson Space Centre in Texas.
“Politically and financially it would be a different question. I am not sure we could ever get that re-established.”

“It is easier to build a spacecraft than to build a team,” said Eugene Kranz, mission director of Apollo 11.
“You have enough knowledge in the industry, but you need top-level leadership that is capable of knocking heads to get people to work as a team.”
These legends of the Apollo era say the most important ingredient of the moon landing was not the technology, though it was one of the greatest bursts of engineering in human history, but the management, national commitment and personal motivation of the participants.
US President Donald Trump criticises Nasa for 2024 moon mission he previously supported, says focus should be on ‘bigger’ initiatives like Mars
“I fear that we no longer have the ability to do what we did in the 1960s,” wrote Don Eyles, a mathematics graduate who in his 20s helped produce the navigation software for the lunar module. Until then, “nobody knew much about programming a spacecraft guidance computer”, so the job went to someone just out of college, one player in a project that employed 400,000 Americans.
“We haven’t had the conviction since then,” he said.
The current Nasa administrator, Jim Bridenstine, takes a far more optimistic view, saying technology would make the journey safer and cheaper than in the 1960s.
He is overseeing a plan to return to the moon by 2024 and put a female astronaut on its south pole to investigate frozen water there.
Though Bridenstine is confident and believes private investors will help support his effort, many past attempts to reinvigorate the human space programme have started on high hopes and fizzled.
The success of Apollo 11 depended on a lot of things that seem unlikely or intolerable today.
It was an era of unquestioning trust of young engineers, trial-and-error design, blank cheques to big aerospace corporations and gruff management practices.
When mistakes were made, scapegoats were found.


These were years of 60-to-80-hour work weeks. Engineers were run ragged. There were ulcers, heart attacks, heavy drinking, chain smoking, abandoned families, divorces and the ever-looming threat that the Soviet Union would steal the prize.
And one other layer of complexity: valuable contributions from a staff of German rocket scientists who had worked for Adolf Hitler before their capture by the US Army in World War II.
Much of this management culture would be politically incorrect in 2019, a fact that Kranz readily acknowledged.
“This would be a problem today,” he said.
The country’s social needs were set aside to provide Nasa funding that at its peak reached an inflation-adjusted US$47 billion or more in a single year.
Nasa consumed 4.5 per cent of the federal budget, compared with about 0.5 per cent today, meaning that if it were to have the same share now its budget would not be the current US$21.5 billion, but nearly US$200 billion.
Apollo 11 moon landing conspiracy … the truth is out there
But the motivation then was the cold war. The Soviet Union had humiliated the United States by launching the first satellite in 1957 and then the first human into orbit in 1961.
To a world split between West and East, the Soviet breakthroughs argued that communism could outperform capitalism.
In a landmark 1962 speech at Rice University, President John F. Kennedy said: “No nation which expects to be the leader of other nations can expect to stay behind in the race for space.”
The speech is widely regarded as the most moving and powerful explanation for space exploration, delivered in a style that only Kennedy could accomplish, detailed but sweeping, cautious but aggressive.
It would cost every man, woman and child 40 cents that year, Kennedy said, and the cost would rise to 50 cents (US$4.27 in today’s dollars) the next year.
The space race gave a political justification for the project, but most likely played little role in its success.

“People say the reason Apollo was successful is that we were trying to beat the Russians,” Honeycutt said.
“That may have been true in Washington, but I can tell you in the Mission Control Centre and the other centres, beating the Russians was not in anybody’s mind.”
What did make the space programme succeed, in part, was that it took place at an extraordinary moment in American history when youth were playing a bigger and more influential role than ever before, exemplified by a young president, a youth culture that demanded change and an army of young engineers who wanted to remake the world.
“We had flight controllers who were straight out of college,” Griffin said.
“We had all these young guys who were raring to go. The leadership pushed decisions down in the organisation, they didn’t elevate them.
They trusted people below them. The idea was, let’s not worry about who gets credit; let’s not second-guess everybody. We knew the topics better than they did. That’s not what we have now. I could feel it in Nasa before I left.”
Another change in Nasa since then has been its higher safety margins – in other words, its aversion o risk.
“People get more and more into risk-avoidance,” said Honeycutt.
“You don’t want to be unsafe, but there is only one way to be completely safe and that is not to launch. As you move up the chain, acceptance of risk gets tighter and tighter.”
Apollo 11: what Neil Armstrong really said on the moon 50 years ago
With today’s thinking, Honeycutt said, the lunar programme would have been cancelled after the near disaster of Apollo 13, when an explosion damaged the spacecraft part way to the moon.
It was the quick thinking of the Nasa flight staff under the direction of Kranz that ensured the crew’s safe return.
Advanced technology certainly does not guarantee safety. Boeing, one of the nation’s top engineering organisations, has grounded its most important product, the 737 MAX jetliner, because of both software system defects and management errors that caused two passenger jet crashes on foreign airlines, for example.
Among outsiders, there are darker concerns about what the changes at Nasa represent about the nation.
“The way our society has changed, it is not clear whether we are equipped to make use of scientific and engineering resources,” said James Moore, a USC engineering professor who decided to become an engineer because of the Apollo moon landing.

“Public authority seems to be more focused on process and less focused on performance.”
The Apollo programme depended critically on political support, though it took a lot of bartering to ensure it.
Kennedy needed the backing of conservative Southern Democrats, so Nasa made big investments in the South.
By the time of Apollo 11, it had its human space flight centre in Houston, an engine test facility in Mississippi, a space flight centre that hosted the German scientists in Alabama, the launch centre at Florida’s Cape Canaveral and the original centre of Nasa operations in southern Virginia.
“It wasn’t an accident, you can bet on it,” said Sean O’Keefe, Nasa administrator during the presidency of George W. Bush who is now a professor at Syracuse University.
But the political landscape and the ability to forge coalitions have changed.
“There was no partisanship on the (House) Science Committee,” said Don Fuqua, the Florida Democrat who chaired the House human space flight subcommittee during the latter part of the Apollo programme, and later the full Science Committee.
“I never took anything to the House floor that the ranking member (New Mexico Republican Manuel Lujan Jnr) and I did not agree on. We were good personal friends. We went to launches together. We went to dinner together. Our wives were good friends.”
“I don’t think we could have that collaboration today,” he added.
“If you cross the aisle to talk to somebody, it is like collaborating with the enemy.”
The other critical ingredient in the Apollo programme was that it offered a non-military goal for many young engineers who were opposed to the Vietnam war.
“I always saw space as the opposite to building strategic weapons,” said Eyles, the guidance computer programmer who recently wrote the book Sunburst and Luminary, a personal account of the Apollo programme.
In that era, he and others from the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory would attend anti-war rallies. Today, he is disappointed that liberals are not stronger supporters of human space flight, asserting, “When was America ever stronger than after we landed on the moon?”

Efforts to grow the human space flight mission have repeatedly foundered. The US space agency has not fully developed a new rocket engine since the space shuttle in the 1970s, and the industrial base has withered.
In 2004, President Bush announced development of the Orion spacecraft and Ares launch system that he said would help US astronauts return to the moon as soon as 2015 as a first step to Mars.
Nasa began work on the programme in 2005, but schedule delays and cost increases piled up.
In 2009, an independent review panel ordered by the Obama administration found the programme faced a “mismatch between funding and programme content” from the beginning.
“It was not funded to the level it needed to be in order to be successful,” said Leroy Chiao, a former astronaut who was on the committee.
“It kind of got further and further behind as the programme went on.”
In 2010, President Barack Obama cancelled the Constellation programme, setting a new goal of a human landing on an asteroid using parts left over from main engines on the space shuttle and an enlarged version of the space shuttle solid rocket booster.
Those would be coupled with the Orion capsule that could carry four astronauts. It is this foundation that Nasa is planning to use for the lunar mission in 2024.
“It is a new rocket, and anytime you build something new, you’re going to have development that’s complicated,” said Wayne Hale, former Nasa space shuttle programme manager and later a deputy associate administrator at the agency.
“The real problem is this idea that we’re going to make this very complicated rocket on a shoestring budget.”

Public support for returning to the moon also is not the same as in the 1960s. A Pew Research poll last year found that only 13 per cent of Americans thought putting astronauts on the moon should be a top Nasa priority; the majority said the agency should focus on monitoring climate or tracking asteroids.
Bridenstine, the Nasa chief, said it will cost far less to return to the moon, thanks to the investments made in the 1960s and to the lower cost of electronics today.
He puts the cost at US$20 billion or less, not including the US$10.5 billion spent annually on the human space flight programme that largely supports the International Space Station.
But so far, the agency has requested only US$1.6 billion of that US$20 billion requirement.
But he is optimistic and says the private sector is eager to invest in the project. “We didn’t know there was water ice on the moon until 2009,” he said. “What else is there that we don’t know?”
Where genuine breakthroughs have occurred, it has not been in the Nasa human space flight programme.
Commercial space companies, such as Elon Musk’s SpaceX, have risen to prominence. The Hawthorne-based company currently carries cargo for Nasa to the space station with its Falcon 9 rockets and Dragon cargo capsule, and will soon use those rockets and a Crew Dragon vehicle to ferry astronauts to the station.
SpaceX stunned the aerospace industry in 2015 when it vertically landed a first-stage booster back on land.
Since then, it has landed boosters more than 40 times and has flown previously used boosters more than 20 times.
The SpaceX culture has parallels with 1960s-era Nasa.
Significant input comes from the lowest parts of the organisation, and its employees tend to be “a young group that doesn’t really know what’s impossible because they haven’t been beaten down,” said Garrett Reisman, a former Nasa astronaut who is a senior adviser for the company and teaches at USC. “They go out and do impossible things.”
And Nasa’s unmanned probes and orbital observatories are a point of national pride. Nasa, led by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in La Canada Flintridge, has landed eight increasingly sophisticated generations of machines on Mars.
But even those accomplishments had to overcome changes in the Nasa organisation.
“At Nasa, there is a whole lot more bureaucracy than there was in the 1970s or even the 1980s,” said Charles Elachi, who led JPL for 15 years ending in 2016.
“It would take months to years to make decisions on something that could be done in weeks.”


Can Chinese scientists bring Nasa’s ‘space spider’ dream to life?

China names 2 Pakistani astronauts chosen to train for Tiangong space station mission

Style Edit: The Omega Speedmaster’s 60-year legacy, from Apollo 11 to Artemis II

Japan to focus on lunar rover after US halts moon space station

Space

Could the Apollo 11 moon landing be duplicated today?

Earth viewed from the Apollo 11 lunar landing module prior to its landing on the moon in 1969. File photo: Nasa

This detail of a July 20, 1969 photo made available by NASA shows astronaut Neil Armstrong reflected in the helmet visor of Buzz Aldrin on the surface of the moon. The astronauts had a camera mounted to the front of their suits, according to the Universities Space Research Association. So rather than holding the camera up to his eye, as we’re accustomed to, Armstrong would have taken the photos from near his chest, which is where Armstrong’s hands appear to be in his reflection. (Neil Armstrong/NASA via AP)

epa07672250 A handout photo made available by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) shows the American flag fluttering in front of a 'Saturn V' rocket carrying the 'Apollo 11', the first Lunar landing mission, into space, in Cape Canaveral, USA, on 16 July 1969 (issued 25 June 2019). The year 2019 marks the 50th anniversary of the first moon landing, an event seen as the peak of the United States' space program of the 1960s which put an end to the so-called 'Race to Space' between the Cold War rivals the US and the Soviet Union, that once was triggered by the USSR's 04 October 1957 launch of the 'Sputnik 1' satellite. NASA astronaut Neil Armstrong made history when he stepped out of the Apollo 11's 'Eagle' landing module on 21 July 1969 and left the first human footprints on the moon. EPA-EFE/NASA HANDOUT ATTENTION: For the full PHOTO ESSAY text please see Advisory Notice epa07672247 HANDOUT EDITORIAL USE ONLY/NO SALES

In this July 20, 1969 photo made available by NASA, flight controllers work in the Mission Operations Control Room in the Mission Control Center during the Apollo 11 lunar extravehicular activity. The television monitor shows astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin on the surface of the moon. (NASA via AP)

epa07672257 A handout photo made available by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) shows the 'Eagle' lunar landing module in landing configuration in lunar orbit taken by service module 'Columbia' commander Michael Collins on 20 July 1969(issued 25 June 2019). The sensor probes under the landing pods sent a signal to the crew to shut down the descent engine. The year 2019 marks the 50th anniversary of the first moon landing, an event seen as the peak of the United States' space program of the 1960s which put an end to the so-called 'Race to Space' between the Cold War rivals the US and the Soviet Union, that once was triggered by the USSR's 04 October 1957 launch of the 'Sputnik 1' satellite. NASA astronaut Neil Armstrong made history when he stepped out of the Apollo 11's 'Eagle' landing module on 21 July 1969 and left the first human footprints on the moon. EPA-EFE/MICHEL COLLINS/NASA HANDOUT ATTENTION: For the full PHOTO ESSAY text please see Advisory Notice epa0

epa07672260 A handout photo made available by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) shows one of the first steps taken on the Moon in an image of Edwin 'Buzz' Aldrin's bootprint in the moon's dust on 20 July 1969 (issued 25 June 2019). The year 2019 marks the 50th anniversary of the first moon landing, an event seen as the peak of the United States' space program of the 1960s which put an end to the so-called 'Race to Space' between the Cold War rivals the US and the Soviet Union, that once was triggered by the USSR's 04 October 1957 launch of the 'Sputnik 1' satellite. NASA astronaut Neil Armstrong made history when he stepped out of the Apollo 11's 'Eagle' landing module on 21 July 1969 and left the first human footprints on the moon. EPA-EFE/NASA HANDOUT ATTENTION: For the full PHOTO ESSAY text please see Advisory Notice epa07672247 HANDOUT EDITORIAL USE ONLY/NO SALES

Apollo 11 moon landing conspiracy … the truth is out there

Astronaut Edwin ‘Buzz’ Aldrin walks on the moon, or in a Hollywood studio, depending who you ask. Photo: EPA

epa07672252 An undated handout photo made available by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) shows the 'Apollo 11 lunar landing mission crew with (L-R) mission commander Neil A. Armstrong, command module pilot Michael Collins and lunar module pilot Edwin E. Aldrin Jr. posing in their space suits (issued 25 June 2019). The year 2019 marks the 50th anniversary of the first moon landing, an event seen as the peak of the United States' space program of the 1960s which put an end to the so-called 'Race to Space' between the Cold War rivals the US and the Soviet Union, that once was triggered by the USSR's 04 October 1957 launch of the 'Sputnik 1' satellite. NASA astronaut Neil Armstrong made history when he stepped out of the Apollo 11's 'Eagle' landing module on 21 July 1969 and left the first human footprints on the moon. EPA-EFE/NASA HANDOUT ATTENTION: For the full PHOTO ESSAY text please see Advisory Notice epa07672247 HANDOUT EDITORIAL USE ONLY/NO SALES

epa07672253 A handout photo made available by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) shows Launch Control Center personnel watching as the 'Saturn V' rocket carrying the 'Apollo 11' astronauts lifts off the launch pad in Cape Canavarel on 16 July 1969 (issued 25 June 2019). The year 2019 marks the 50th anniversary of the first moon landing, an event seen as the peak of the United States' space program of the 1960s which put an end to the so-called 'Race to Space' between the Cold War rivals the US and the Soviet Union, that once was triggered by the USSR's 04 October 1957 launch of the 'Sputnik 1' satellite. NASA astronaut Neil Armstrong made history when he stepped out of the Apollo 11's 'Eagle' landing module on 21 July 1969 and left the first human footprints on the moon. EPA-EFE/NASA HANDOUT BLACK/WHITE ONLY * ATTENTION: For the full PHOTO ESSAY text please see Advisory Notice epa07672247 HANDOUT EDITORIAL USE ONLY/NO SALES

epa07672262 (FILE) - A handout photo made available by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) shows 'Apollo 11' astronaut Edwin 'Buzz' Aldrin's boot and footprint in lunar soil on 20 July 1969 (issued 25 June 2019). The year 2019 marks the 50th anniversary of the first moon landing, an event seen as the peak of the United States' space program of the 1960s which put an end to the so-called 'Race to Space' between the Cold War rivals the US and the Soviet Union, that once was triggered by the USSR's 04 October 1957 launch of the 'Sputnik 1' satellite. NASA astronaut Neil Armstrong made history when he stepped out of the Apollo 11's 'Eagle' landing module on 21 July 1969 and left the first human footprints on the moon. EPA-EFE/EDWIN ALDRIN/NASA HANDOUT ATTENTION: For the full PHOTO ESSAY text please see Advisory Notice epa07672247 HANDOUT EDITORIAL USE ONLY/NO SALES *** Local Caption *** 01797767

epa07672259 (FILE) - A handout photo made available by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) shows Earthrise viewed from the 'Apollo 11' mission's lunar landing module 'Eagle' prior to its landing on 20 July 1969 (issued 25 June 2019). The year 2019 marks the 50th anniversary of the first moon landing, an event seen as the peak of the United States' space program of the 1960s which put an end to the so-called 'Race to Space' between the Cold War rivals the US and the Soviet Union, that once was triggered by the USSR's 04 October 1957 launch of the 'Sputnik 1' satellite. NASA astronaut Neil Armstrong made history when he stepped out of the Apollo 11's 'Eagle' landing module on 21 July 1969 and left the first human footprints on the moon. EPA-EFE/NASA HANDOUT ATTENTION: For the full PHOTO ESSAY text please see Advisory Notice epa07672247 HANDOUT EDITORIAL USE ONLY/NO SALES *** Local Caption *** 01797773

Astronaut Edwin ‘Buzz’ Aldrin walks on the moon, or in a Hollywood studio, depending who you ask. Photo: AP

Apollo 11: what Neil Armstrong really said on the moon 50 years ago

In this July 20, 1969 image made from television, Apollo 11 astronaut Neil Armstrong steps onto the surface of the moon. File photo: Nasa

Just months after Apollo 11, NASA sent men to the moon with porn strapped to their wrists

A photo shows the broadcasting dish and color television camera mounted on the moon during Apollo 12. Photo: NASA

Apollo 12 launches in stormy weather. Photo: NASA

Photo: NASA

An illustration by Ernie Reyes. Photo: NASA

You can just barely make out one of several Playboy playmates strapped to Pete Conrad's wrist. Photo: NASA

OMEGA celebrates five decades of lunar adventures with new Speedmaster Apollo 11 50th Anniversary Limited Editions 

The OMEGA Speedmaster Apollo 11 Moonshine™ Gold 50th Anniversary Limited Edition celebrates 50 years since the Moon Landing. 

The open caseback provides a full view of the new OMEGA Calibre 3861 METAS certified Master Chronometer movement. 

The OMEGA Speedmaster Apollo 11 50th Anniversary Limited Edition in Stainless Steel. 

The caseback depicts a laser-engraved footprint and Neil Armstrong’s legendary quote. 

The 9 o’clock subdial features the famous image of Buzz Aldrin climbing down the ladder onto the lunar surface. 

OMEGA

News

World

United States & Canada

Technically it would be easier, but politically and financially it would be a different question


The passage of half a century has blurred many of the reasons that the United States was able to accomplish what seemed like science fiction: the July 20, 1969, landing of Apollo 11 on the moon.


History

Could the Apollo 11 moon landing be duplicated today?

.css-1mniedq{color:inherit;font-weight:inherit;font-size:inherit;font-family:inherit;line-height:inherit;}Technically it would be easier, but politically and financially it would be a different question

Technically it would be easier, but politically and financially it would be a different question