Explained: what is the Trump-Biden-Ukraine scandal about?

Recently, a whistle-blower from the US intelligence community voiced urgent concern about a matter involving the president. The White House is refusing to release the whistle-blower’s complaint to Congress but it has been reported that it is about a conversation between Donald Trump and the president of Ukraine. In public, Trump is calling for an investigation of former vice-president Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, that involves Ukraine. Whistle-blower complaint: Joe Biden demands probe, accuses Donald Trump of trying to ‘smear’ him The president’s interest in getting dirt from abroad on a prospective election rival has been hiding in plain sight for months. The president has behaved this way before. In 2016, he openly encouraged Russia to snoop on Hillary Clinton’s email. More recently, he said he would listen to foreigners who came to him with dirt on opponents. Here are some questions and answers about why the Ukraine matter has now become a full-blown scandal. How did the whistle-blower complaint happen? Someone in the US government, under the umbrella of US intelligence, saw or heard something that raised a credible and “urgent concern” about how someone else in government did or said something that “involves confidential and potentially privileged communications by persons outside the intelligence community”. That’s according to Michael Atkinson, the inspector general for intelligence. The contents of the complaint remain a closely held secret. But reporting has revealed that the complaint was based on a series of events, one of which was a July 25 call between Trump and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky. What has Trump said about the complaint? “Just another political hack job.” “I have conversations with many leaders. It’s always appropriate.” “It doesn’t matter what I discussed.” “The conversation I had was largely congratulatory, was largely corruption … and largely the fact that we don’t want our people, like vice-president Biden and his son, creating … the corruption already in the Ukraine.” Whistle-blower controversy: impeachment calls grow as Donald Trump admits Bidens were subject of Ukraine phone call What have Democrats said? House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has said that if reports about the complaint bear out, Trump will face “serious repercussions” and the nation will have “grave, urgent concerns for our national security”. Pelosi has resisted pressure from members to impeach Trump over his links to Russia. She will find her every word on this matter scrutinised for signs of whether this makes her want to move ahead. On Sunday Adam Schiff, the Democratic chair of the House intelligence committee, told CNN “we may have crossed the Rubicon” regarding impeachment. Where does Ukraine come into this? Biden was US vice-president, with some influence over US policy on Ukraine, when his son Hunter was on the board of an energy company owned by a Ukrainian businessman. Trump has been calling for more scrutiny of that period and attributing corrupt motives to the business and government work of the Biden family, without putting forward evidence of wrongdoing, undeterred by the revelation of the whistle-blower complaint. The question is whether Trump personally pressed Zelensky to investigate the Bidens in their call or other times and, if so, whether seeking or accepting such help from a foreign leader to benefit his re-election constitutes a misuse of presidential power. That question can’t be answered with what’s known so far. Is this Russia redux? There are some similarities with the episode investigated by special counsel Robert Mueller, the aggressive effort by Russia to tilt the 2016 election to Trump. There are also differences, as well as much that remains unknown. The Mueller report informed or reminded everyone that it is illegal for a political campaign to accept a “thing of value” from a foreign government. It could be argued that an investigation by a foreign government meant to harm a political opponent would be a thing of value, and pressing for one could be perilous for a US president. It could also be argued that it is not. The Trump administration has had long-standing complaints about corruption in Ukraine and asking for corruption to be investigated is, on the surface, different than the potential collusion between Moscow and the Trump campaign which Mueller investigated. One striking twist is that pressure for a Ukrainian investigation of the Bidens has come most publicly not from the government or the campaign, but from Trump’s personal lawyer. Rudy Giuliani has been working for months to get Ukraine’s leadership to investigate the Bidens. What has Giuliani been doing? In May, Giuliani scrapped plans to take his case for a Biden investigation directly to authorities in Kiev, when word got out about the trip. But he’s been talking to Ukrainians about it. At the time, he tweeted: “Explain to me why Biden shouldn’t be investigated if his son got millions from a Russian loving crooked Ukrainian oligarch while He was VP and point man for Ukraine”. Explain to me why Biden shouldn’t be investigated if his son got millions from a Russian loving crooked Ukrainian oligarch while He was VP and point man for Ukraine. Ukrainians are investigating and your fellow Dems are interfering. Election is 17 months away.Let’s answer it now https://t.co/FT34kX7Pst — Rudy Giuliani (@RudyGiuliani) May 10, 2019 Trump tag-teamed him, telling Fox News: “I’m hearing it’s a major scandal, major problem”. Asked Thursday on CNN if he had pressed Ukrainian leaders to investigate the Bidens, Giuliani said: “Of course I did” seconds after saying, “No, actually I didn’t”. Where’s the whistle-blower complaint? Under wraps. Only bits and pieces of information about it have emerged because the administration has balked at showing it to Congress, much less to the public. Atkinson, the inspector general, received the complaint on August 12, reviewed it and found it credible and urgent, and forwarded it two weeks later to Joseph Maguire, acting director of national intelligence. Maguire’s office decided the complaint was outside the agency’s jurisdiction and not urgent, and informed Congress on September 9 of the situation without showing it the complaint. Atkinson said that was a break from normal procedure, which is to disclose the contents to lawmakers. House Democrats began to suspect that Trump was the subject of the complaint and quickly followed with a subpoena, yet to be satisfied. Atkinson appeared before the House intelligence committee behind closed doors on Thursday but declined, under administration orders, to tell lawmakers the substance of the complaint. Maguire has agreed to give public testimony on September 26 and both are expected to talk to the Senate intelligence committee next week.

Explained: what is the Trump-Biden-Ukraine scandal about?

.css-1mniedq{color:inherit;font-weight:inherit;font-size:inherit;font-family:inherit;line-height:inherit;} What you need to know about the whistle-blower’s complaint that the White House is refusing to release to Congress

How did the whistle-blower complaint happen?

What you need to know about the whistle-blower’s complaint that the White House is refusing to release to Congress