Advertisement

Trump impeachment investigators question White House budget official over decision to withhold funding from Ukraine

  • Mark Sandy, a little known career official at the Office of Management and Budget, was involved in key meetings about the nearly US$400 million aid package

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
The US Capitol dome is seen from the entrance to the House Intelligence Committee's hearing during the closed-door deposition of Mark Sandy. Photo: REUTERS

Impeachment investigators met on Saturday with a White House official directly connected to US President Donald Trump’s block on military aid to Ukraine, the first budget office witness to testify in the historic inquiry.

In a rare weekend session, lawmakers drilled into Trump’s decision – against the advice of national security advisers, including John Bolton – to withhold funding from the ally, a young democracy bordering hostile Russia.

It is a sign of a deepening of the constitutional showdown, bookended by public hearings this week and next, that is testing the system of checks and balances in the US government.

Advertisement

“It seems clear to me from everything that I’ve seen that the president had no interest in the defence of Ukraine and the security of the Ukrainian people,” said Rep. Jamie Raskin, a Maryland Democrat, during a break in the closed-door proceedings.

Republican Representative Mark Meadows, joined at left by Democrat Representative Lee Zeldin speaks to reporters as Mark Sandy, a career employee in the White House Office of Management and Budget, is interviewed in a secure room at the Capitol in the House impeachment inquiry. Photo: AP Photo
Republican Representative Mark Meadows, joined at left by Democrat Representative Lee Zeldin speaks to reporters as Mark Sandy, a career employee in the White House Office of Management and Budget, is interviewed in a secure room at the Capitol in the House impeachment inquiry. Photo: AP Photo
Advertisement

Raskin said it is important for lawmakers “to trace the bureaucratic steps” that allowed money Congress had already approved to be upheld by the executive branch. “We’re in the process of chasing that down.”

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x