Prince Andrew fails to get sex abuse case dismissed despite Jeffrey Epstein deal
- A US judge has ruled that accuser Virginia Giuffre’s suit can go ahead, as her US$500,000 settlement with the late financier does not involve the UK royal
- Giuffre sued the prince in August, saying she was coerced into sexual encounters with Andrew by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell when she was 17
A judge has – for now – refused to dismiss a lawsuit against Britain’s Prince Andrew by an American woman who says he sexually abused her when she was 17.
Stressing on Wednesday that he was not ruling on the truth of the allegations, US District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan rejected an argument by Andrew’s lawyers that Virginia Giuffre’s lawsuit should be thrown out at an early stage because of an old legal settlement she had reached with Jeffrey Epstein, the financier she claims set up sexual encounters with the prince.
Kaplan said the US$500,000 settlement between Epstein and Giuffre did not involve the prince and did not bar a suit against him now.
Giuffre sued the prince in August, saying she was coerced into sexual encounters with Andrew in 2001 by Epstein and his long-time companion, Ghislaine Maxwell.
Andrew’s lawyers had said the lawsuit lacked specificity and was disqualified by the deal she reached in 2009 with lawyers for Epstein. They also attacked the credibility and motives of Giuffre, saying in October that the lawsuit was aimed at achieving “another payday at his expense and at the expense of those closest to him”.
The prince’s lawyers have said that Andrew never sexually abused or assaulted Giuffre and that he “unequivocally denies Giuffre’s false allegations against him”.
The prince himself has strenuously denied Giuffre’s allegations. In late 2019, Prince Andrew told BBC Newsnight that sex with Giuffre “didn’t happen” and he has “no recollection” of ever meeting her.
The interview was widely panned by critics who said Andrew seemed insensitive to Epstein’s victims. Afterward, the prince stepped back from royal duties.
On Wednesday, his lawyers did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment. Buckingham Palace said it would not comment on the “ongoing legal matter”.
Kaplan noted that he was required by law, at this stage of the litigation, to proceed as if the allegations made by Giuffre are true.
“The law prohibits the Court from considering at this stage of the proceedings defendant’s efforts to cast doubt on the truth of Ms Giuffre’s allegations, even though his efforts would be permissible at trial,” Kaplan said.
Giuffre’s settlement with Epstein was reached a decade before the financier killed himself at the age of 66 at a Manhattan lock-up as he awaited a sex trafficking trial in 2019.
But Kaplan wrote that there were substantial indications in the US$500,000 settlement that Epstein and Giuffre did not clearly intend for language to “directly”, “primarily” or “substantially” benefit someone such as the prince. He noted that the prince was not a party to the agreement.
He also said the agreement was “far from a model of clear and precise drafting”.
The judge’s findings mirrored comments he made during oral arguments by both sides when he was particularly dismissive of the arguments made on the prince’s behalf.
Maxwell, 60, was recently convicted of sex trafficking and conspiracy charges in federal court in New York. Giuffre’s allegations against Andrew were not a part of either criminal case.