Advertisement
Advertisement
US-China relations
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
A supervisor displays crushed ore before it is sent to the mill at the MP Materials rare earth mine in Mountain Pass, California, the only such mine in the US. Photo: Reuters

US bill would block defence contractors from using Chinese rare earths

  • If passed, the bipartisan legislation would use the Pentagon to create a permanent stockpile in a bid to loosen Beijing’s grip on the strategic minerals
  • While the United States created the industry in World War II, China has slowly grown to control the entire sector the past 30 years

A bipartisan piece of legislation introduced in the US Senate on Friday would force defence contractors to stop buying rare earths from China by 2026 and use the Pentagon to create a permanent stockpile of the strategic minerals.

The bill, sponsored by Senators Tom Cotton, an Arkansas Republican, and Mark Kelly, an Arizona Democrat, is the latest in a string of US legislation seeking to thwart China’s near control over the sector.

It essentially uses the Pentagon’s purchase of billions of dollars worth of fighter planes, missiles and other weapons as leverage to require contractors to stop relying on China and, by extension, support the revival of US rare earths production.

Rare earths are a group of 17 metals that, after processing, are used to make magnets found in electric vehicles, weaponry and electronics.

US Senator Tom Cotton attends a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in Washington in April. Photo: TNS

While the United States created the industry in World War II and US military scientists developed the most widely-used type of rare earth magnet, China has slowly grown to control the entire sector the past 30 years.

The United States has only one rare earths mine and has no capability to process rare earth minerals.

“Ending American dependence on China for rare earths extraction and processing is critical to building up the US defence and technology sectors,” Cotton said.

The senator, who sits on the Senate’s Armed Forces and Intelligence committees, described China’s evolution into the global rare earths leader as “simply a policy choice that the United States made,” adding that he hoped fresh policies would loosen Beijing’s grip.

China’s new rare earth merger hands it ‘trump card’ against US

Known as the Restoring Essential Energy and Security Holdings Onshore for Rare Earths Act of 2022, the bill would codify and make permanent the Pentagon’s ongoing stockpiling of the materials.

China temporarily blocked rare earth exports to Japan in 2010 and has issued vague threats it could do the same to the United States.

To build that reserve, though, the Pentagon buys supply in part from China, a paradox that Senate staff hope will abate in time.

The rare earths production process can be highly pollutive, part of the reason it grew unpopular in the United States. Ongoing research is attempting to make the process cleaner.

01:44

Amid US-China trade war, China aims to elevate its domestic rare earth industry

Amid US-China trade war, China aims to elevate its domestic rare earth industry
Cotton said he has talked to various US executive agencies about the bill, but declined to say if he had talked with President Joe Biden or the White House.

“This is an area in which Congress will lead, because many members have been concerned about this very topic, regardless of party,” he said.

Most members of the nascent US rare earths sector praised the bill, though some worried defence contractors could continue to ask for waivers to buy Chinese rare earths even after 2026.

The Aerospace Industries Association, a trade group for Northrop Grumman Corp, Lockheed Martin Corp and other US aerospace and defence companies, declined to comment on the bill.

Task force: US defence firms must reduce reliance on China minerals

“Well placed policies such as this one get us closer to the target of onshoring this critical supply chain,” said Marty Weems, North American president of Australia-based American Rare Earths, which is developing three US rare earth projects.

MP Materials Corp, which operates the only US rare earths mine and relies on Chinese processors, said it appreciates “ongoing efforts by the Department of Defence and broader US government to secure the domestic rare earth supply chain and promote free and fair competition”.

The bill, which the sponsors expect could be folded into Pentagon funding legislation later this year, offers no direct support for US rare earths miners or processors.

Instead, it requires Pentagon contractors to stop using Chinese rare earths within four years, allowing waivers only in rare situations. Defence contractors would be required to immediately say where they source the minerals.

I don’t think the answer to Chinese aggression or Chinese threats is to continue to subject ourselves to Chinese threats.
Tom Cotton, US senator

Those requirements “should encourage more domestic (rare earths) development in our country”, Cotton said.

The Pentagon has in the past two years given grants to companies trying to resume US rare earth processing and magnet production, including MP Materials, Australia’s Lynas Rare Earth Ltd, TDA Magnetics Inc and Urban Mining Co.

Kelly, a former astronaut and a member of the Senate’s Armed Services and Energy committees, said the bill should “strengthen America’s position as a global leader in technology by reducing our country’s reliance on adversaries like China for rare earth elements”.

China’s Inner Mongolia eyes fivefold boost in rare earth earnings

The bill only applies to weapons, not other equipment the US military purchases.

Additionally, the US trade representative would be required to investigate whether China is distorting the rare earths market and recommend whether trade sanctions are needed.

When asked if such a step could be seen as antagonistic by Beijing, Cotton said: “I don’t think the answer to Chinese aggression or Chinese threats is to continue to subject ourselves to Chinese threats.”

32