Advertisement
Advertisement
Sexual harassment and assault
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
An undated picture shows British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell and US financier Jeffrey Epstein posing inside a private jet. Photo: US Attorney Office via dpa

US judge denies Ghislaine Maxwell’s bid for new trial over juror’s false statements

  • A jury member had told reporters he was sexually abused as a child, despite stating the opposite in a pretrial screening questionnaire
  • Lawyers for the UK socialite, who was convicted of grooming victims for Jeffrey Epstein, say the false statement had denied her the right to a fair trial

A US judge on Friday upheld Ghislaine Maxwell’s sex trafficking conviction, despite a juror’s acknowledgement that he had falsely stated before the trial he had not been sexually abused.

Maxwell, 60, had been convicted in December of helping the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein sexually abuse teenage girls.

The British socialite requested a new trial in January after one of her 12 jurors said in media interviews he had been sexually abused as a child.

Asked in a pretrial screening questionnaire whether he had been a victim of sexual abuse, the juror checked “no”.

Juror No 50 (right) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial leaves federal court in New York on March 8. Photo: AP

Maxwell’s lawyers would have struck the juror from the panel if he had answered honestly, and said his false statement denied Maxwell her right to a fair trial.

Prosecutors contended that Maxwell could not show the juror, identified in court papers as Juror No 50, was biased, after he said during jury selection he would be fair and impartial and decide the case based on the evidence.

In her decision on Friday, US Circuit Judge Alison Nathan said the juror, referred to as Juror 50 in court papers, testified truthfully at a hearing last month over Maxwell’s request for a new trial.

“His failure to disclose his prior sexual abuse during the jury selection process was highly unfortunate, but not deliberate,” Nathan wrote.

“The Court further concludes that Juror 50 harboured no bias toward the defendant and could serve as a fair and impartial juror.”

Maxwell’s lawyers have vowed to appeal against the guilty verdict.

Post