02:52
Finding both were defamed, jury awards Johnny Depp US$15m and Amber Heard US$2m
Jury rules Amber Heard defamed Johnny Depp, awards him US$15 million in damages
- The panel also ruled in favour of Heard in some aspects of her countersuit against Depp, awarding her US$2 million in damages
- The widely watched trial featured explicit and graphic evidence and testimony detailing the former Hollywood couple’s soured relationship
A Virginia jury on Wednesday ruled that actor Amber Heard defamed her ex-husband Johnny Depp in a widely watched six-week trial that featured explicit and graphic evidence and testimony detailing the former Hollywood couple’s soured relationship.
The jury also ruled in favour of Heard in some aspects of her countersuit against Depp. The jury awarded Depp US$15 million in damages from Heard. The panel awarded Heard US$2 million in damages.
Depp, the 58-year-old Pirates of the Caribbean star, sued Heard for US$50 million and argued that she defamed him when she called herself “a public figure representing domestic abuse” in a newspaper opinion piece.
Heard, a 36-year-old actress, countersued for US$100 million, saying Depp smeared her when his lawyer called her accusations a “hoax”.
Depp has denied hitting Heard or any woman and said she was the one who turned violent in their relationship.
Depp wrote in blood from severed finger during row with ex-wife, court told
“The jury gave me my life back. I am truly humbled,” Depp, who watched the verdict from Britain, said in a statement issued by a spokesperson. “The best is yet to come and a new chapter has finally begun,” he added, ending with Latin phrase “Veritas numquam perit. Truth never perishes.”
Heard, seated in the courtroom between two of her lawyers, looked down as the verdicts were read.
“The disappointment I feel today is beyond words,” she said in a statement. “I’m heartbroken that the mountain of evidence still was not enough to stand up to the disproportionate power, influence and sway of my ex-husband.”
“I’m even more disappointed with what this verdict means for other women,” she added. “It is a setback.”
Depp and Heard met in 2011 while filming The Rum Diary and wed in February 2015. Their divorce was finalised about two years later.
At the centre of the legal case is a December 2018 opinion piece by Heard in The Washington Post in which she made the statement about domestic abuse. The article did not mention Depp by name but his lawyer told jurors it was clear that Heard was referring to him.
During six weeks of testimony, Heard’s lawyers argued that she had told the truth and that her comments were covered as free speech under the US Constitution’s First Amendment.
Throughout the case, jurors listened to recordings of the couple’s fights and saw graphic photos of Depp’s bloody finger.
He said the top of the finger was severed when Heard threw a vodka bottle at him in 2015.
Heard denied injuring Depp’s finger and said Depp sexually assaulted her that night with a liquor bottle. She said she struck him only to defend herself or her sister.
Testimony was live-streamed widely on social media, drawing large audiences to hear details about the couple’s troubled relationship.
Johnny Depp loses libel suit against UK tabloid over ‘wife-beater’ story
Once among Hollywood’s biggest stars, Depp said Heard’s allegations cost him “everything”. A new Pirates movie was put on hold and Depp was replaced in the Fantastic Beasts film franchise, a Harry Potter spin-off.
Depp lost a libel case less than two years ago against The Sun, a British tabloid that labelled him a “wife beater”.
A London High Court judge ruled that he had repeatedly assaulted Heard.
Depp’s lawyers filed the US case in Fairfax County, Virginia, because The Washington Post is printed there. The newspaper is not a defendant.
