Advertisement
Advertisement
Cinema
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Tom Cruise stars as Captain Pete “Maverick” Mitchell in Top Gun: Maverick. Photo: Paramount Pictures via TNS

Top Gun heirs sue Paramount over Maverick sequel

  • An article by Ehud Yonay inspired the original 1986 Tom Cruise film, and the copyright reverted back to his family in January 2020
  • Top Gun: Maverick is this year’s biggest box office hit, generating US$291 million in North America and US$548.6 million globally in its first 10 days
Cinema

The family of the author whose article inspired the 1986 Tom Cruise film Top Gun on Monday sued Paramount Pictures for copyright infringement over this year’s blockbuster sequel Top Gun: Maverick.

According to a complaint filed in Los Angeles federal court, the Paramount Global unit failed to reacquire the rights to Ehud Yonay’s 1983 article “Top Guns” from the family before releasing the “derivative” sequel.

The lawsuit by Shosh Yonay and Yuval Yonay, who live in Israel and are respectively Ehud’s widow and son, seeks unspecified damages, including profits from Top Gun: Maverick, and to block distribution of the film or further sequels.

Paramount said in a statement: “These claims are without merit, and we will defend ourselves vigorously.”

Top Gun: Maverick is this year’s biggest box office hit, generating US$291 million in North America and US$548.6 million globally in its first 10 days of release.

The high-flying action film directed by Joseph Kosinski has received strong reviews, and has Cruise reprising his role as US Navy test pilot Pete “Maverick” Mitchell.

Japan’s first woman fighter pilot was inspired by ‘Top Gun’

It is already Cruise’s highest-grossing film in the US, surpassing 2005’s War of the Worlds.

According to Monday’s lawsuit, Paramount obtained exclusive film rights to “Top Guns”, published in the May 1983 issue of California Magazine, before making the 1986 original, and even gave credit.

But the Yonays said Paramount deliberately ignored how the copyright reverted to them in January 2020, “thumbing its nose” at federal copyright law.

The Yonays said they sent Paramount a cease-and-desist letter on May 11, and that in response Paramount denied that the sequel derived from the 1983 article.

They said Paramount also argued that the sequel was “sufficiently completed” by the time the copyright reverted, in a “disingenuous attempt” to qualify for an exception to their claim. The Yonays said the sequel was completed in May 2021.

Lawyers for the Yonays did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Reached by phone, a woman who identified herself as Shosh Yonay and said her son was Yuval declined to comment.

Post