Advertisement
Advertisement
History
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
The bow of the Titanic, on the bottom of the North Atlantic. File photo: AP

A new Titanic expedition is planned. The US government is trying to stop it

  • The US government is in a legal fight with RMS Titanic Inc, which owns the salvage rights to shipwreck
  • Georgia-based firm said planned mission may attempt to recover objects inside the sunken Titanic
History

The US government is trying to stop a planned expedition to recover items of historical interest from the sunken Titanic, citing a federal law and an international agreement that treat the shipwreck as a hallowed gravesite.

The expedition is being organised by RMS Titanic Inc, the Georgia-based firm that owns the salvage rights to the world’s most famous shipwreck.

The company exhibits artifacts that have been recovered from the wreck site at the bottom of the North Atlantic, from silverware to a piece of the Titanic’s hull.

The US government’s challenge comes more than two months after the Titan submersible imploded near the sunken ocean liner, killing five people.

An undated artist depiction of the Titanic sinking. File photo: AFP

But this legal fight has nothing to do with the June tragedy, which involved a different company and an unconventionally designed vessel.

The battle in the US District Court in Norfolk, Virginia, which oversees Titanic salvage matters, hinges instead on federal law and a pact with Great Britain to treat the sunken Titanic as a memorial to the more than 1,500 people who died. The ship hit an iceberg and sank in 1912.

The US argues that entering the Titanic’s severed hull - or physically altering or disturbing the wreck - is regulated by federal law and its agreement with Britain.

Among the government’s concerns is the possible disturbance of artifacts and any human remains that may still exist.

“RMST is not free to disregard this validly enacted federal law, yet that is its stated intent,” US lawyers argued in court documents filed Friday. They added that the shipwreck “will be deprived of the protections Congress granted it”.

RMST’s expedition is tentatively planned for May 2024, according to a report it filed with the court in June.

The company said it plans to take images of the entire wreck. That includes “inside the wreck where deterioration has opened chasms sufficient to permit a remotely operated vehicle to penetrate the hull without interfering with the current structure”.

RMST said it would recover artifacts from the debris field and “may recover free-standing objects inside the wreck”. Those could include “objects from inside the Marconi room, but only if such objects are not affixed to the wreck itself”.

The Marconi room holds the ship’s radio - a Marconi wireless telegraph machine - which broadcast the Titanic’s increasingly frantic distress signals after the ocean liner hit an iceberg.

The messages in Morse code were picked up by other ships and onshore receiving stations, helping to save the lives of about 700 people who fled in life boats. There had been 2,208 passengers and crew on the Titanic’s maiden voyage, from Southampton, England, to New York.

01:12

New footage of Titanic wreck released to mark 25th anniversary of blockbuster film

New footage of Titanic wreck released to mark 25th anniversary of blockbuster film

“At this time, the company does not intend to cut into the wreck or detach any part of the wreck,” RMST stated.

The company said it would “work collaboratively” with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the US agency that represents the public’s interest in the wreck. But RMST said it does not intend to seek a permit.

US government lawyers said the firm can’t proceed without one, arguing that RMST needs approval from the US Secretary of Commerce, who oversees NOAA.

The company has not filed a response in court, but it previously challenged the constitutionality of US efforts to “infringe” on its salvage rights to a wreck in international waters. The firm has argued that only the court in Norfolk has jurisdiction, and points to centuries of precedent in maritime law.

In 2020, the US government and RMST engaged in a nearly identical legal battle over a proposed expedition that could have cut into the wreck. But the proceedings were cut short by the coronavirus pandemic and never fully played out.

Post