Advertisement
Israel-Iran conflict
WorldUnited States & Canada

Trump’s Iran nuclear site strikes: risky bet on ‘peace’ or a recipe for wider war?

It remained to be seen whether the attacks mark the totality of direct US involvement in the conflict or the opening salvo of a larger campaign

4-MIN READ4-MIN
15
Attendees at an anti-war protest in Los Angeles, California, on June 7. Photo: Getty Images via AFP
Associated Press
President Donald Trump with his decision to order US military strikes on Iran’s nuclear facility is gambling that direct US involvement can deliver a decisive blow to a weakened Tehran while managing to avoid bringing the US into an expansive regional conflict.

Trump announced the strikes on three Iranian enrichment facilities – Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan – and said that a “full payload of BOMBS was dropped” on Fordow.

“All planes are safely on their way home,” Trump added in his post. “Congratulations to our great American Warriors. There is not another military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!”

Advertisement

It remained to be seen whether the attacks mark the totality of direct American involvement in strikes against Iran or the opening salvo of a larger campaign.

The decision to directly involve the US comes after more than a week of strikes by Israel on Iran that have moved to systematically eradicate the country’s air defences and offensive missile capabilities, while damaging its nuclear enrichment facilities.

Advertisement

The strikes are a perilous decision for the US, as Iran has pledged to retaliate if it joined the Israeli assault. The stakes are also high for Trump personally – he won the White House on the promise of keeping America out of costly foreign conflicts and scoffed at the value of American interventionism.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x