Advertisement
Donald Trump
WorldUnited States & Canada

Trump birthright citizenship order blocked in third ruling since US Supreme Court decision

The US president is seeking to deny American citizenship to children born to parents who are in the country illegally or temporarily

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
2
Hannah Liu of Washington, whose parents are Chinese immigrants, holds up a sign in support of birthright citizenship outside the US Supreme Court in May. Photo: AP
Associated Press

A federal judge on Friday blocked the Trump administration from ending birthright citizenship for the children of parents who are in the US illegally, issuing the third court ruling blocking the birthright order nationwide since a key Supreme Court decision in June.

US District Judge Leo Sorokin, joining another district court as well as an appellate panel of judges, found that a nationwide injunction granted to more than a dozen states remains in force under an exception to the Supreme Court ruling. That decision restricted the power of lower court judges to issue nationwide injunctions.

The states have argued Trump’s birthright citizenship order is blatantly unconstitutional and threatens millions of dollars for health insurance services that are contingent on citizenship status. The issue is expected to move quickly back to the nation’s highest court.

Advertisement

New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin, who helped lead the lawsuit before Sorokin, said in a statement he was “thrilled the district court again barred President Trump’s flagrantly unconstitutional birthright citizenship order from taking effect anywhere”.

“American-born babies are American, just as they have been at every other time in our nation’s history,” he added. “The president cannot change that legal rule with the stroke of a pen.”

US President Donald Trump signs an executive order on birthright citizenship in the Oval Office in January. Photo: AP
US President Donald Trump signs an executive order on birthright citizenship in the Oval Office in January. Photo: AP

Lawyers for the government had argued Sorokin should narrow the reach of his earlier ruling granting a preliminary injunction, saying it should be “tailored to the states’ purported financial injuries”.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x