Advertisement
China economy
OpinionChina Opinion
Alex Lo

My Take | China and the US are facing parallel economic conundrums

  • Mutual economic quandaries as both try to reshape their economies may force the two bitter rivals to learn to live with each other again

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
7
Pedestrians in Pudong’s Lujiazui Financial District in Shanghai, China. Photo: Bloomberg
Alex Loin Toronto

All is not well with Joe Biden’s attempt to reindustrialise the American economy. A new Financial Times report claims that 40 per cent of major manufacturing investments subsidised by his signature Inflation Reduction Act and Chips and Science Act have been delayed or held up, some indefinitely.

Of the US$400 billion worth of tax credits, loans and grants for mostly green tech and semiconductors, selected projects that have been handed a total of US$84 billion have been so affected. Not everything, but a great deal of both acts is a direct response to the economic and technological challenges posed by China.

The goals are to reanimate American hi-tech manufacturing to take on the Chinese, “friendshore” supply chains and production with allied countries, and to decarbonise the US economy. China is always in the background. So in that sense, the economic conundrums the two countries face are worth comparing.

Advertisement

Washington’s rediscovered industrial policy is increasingly being scrutinised. That’s similar to China’s difficulty in switching towards a more consumption-driven model from reliance on manufacturing for economic growth.

Consider some background numbers. China’s production exceeds that of the nine next largest manufacturing nations combined.

Advertisement

Manufacturing accounts for about 28 per cent and 11 per cent respectively for Chinese and American GDP. However, personal consumption takes up only about 40 per cent of Chinese GDP compared to almost 70 per cent in the US. Ever since US Treasury chief Janet Yellen voiced her controversial criticism that overproduction by China is distorting global supplies, economists have been speculating why that is so, or not.

Guesses and hypotheses run the whole gamut. Richard Baldwin, a noted economist at the IMD Business School in Switzerland, has recently argued that China under Xi Jinping is biased by the old Marxist obsession with production over services. That seems to fit the Western narrative that Xi has abandoned Deng Xiaoping’s pragmatism in favour of dogmatism.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x