-
Advertisement
United States
OpinionWorld Opinion
Kong Qingjiang

Opinion | US disregard of international law must not be tolerated

Principles such as sovereign equality and the peaceful resolution of disputes are the bedrock of international relations – and must be protected

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
3
A sign reading “Greenland is not for sale!” is seen in Nuuk, Greenland, on January 20. Photo: AFP / Getty Images / TNS
“I don’t need international law.” In an interview with The New York Times, US President Donald Trump made this strikingly candid declaration, asserting that his authority as commander-in-chief is constrained only by his own moral code. These remarks, in light of the US military action in Venezuela, its territorial ambitions towards Greenland and its decision to withdraw from 66 international organisations, offer a stark portrait of power politics.
Taken together, Trump’s words and actions amount to a direct challenge to the international order established after World War II.

In the interview, Trump laid out what might be called his philosophy of power. “[T]here is one thing. My own morality. My own mind. It’s the only thing that can stop me,” he said. When pressed on whether the United States must comply with international law, Trump offered a nominal affirmation but immediately qualified it by saying compliance depended on “what your definition of international law is”. In other words, he positioned himself as the final arbiter.

Advertisement

Such views run counter to the principle that states may not invoke domestic law as a justification for violating international law. Trump’s remarks expose an openly opportunistic approach: international rules are invoked when they serve US interests and discarded when they do not. This “America first” mindset is a form of American exceptionalism, one in which domestic power overrides international obligations.

The US military actions in Venezuela illustrate this philosophy in practice. The United States not only used force against a sovereign state but also arrested its sitting president, Nicolas Maduro, and subsequently brought domestic criminal charges against him. Such actions violate Article 2 of the UN Charter, which prohibits the use of force, and contradict the principle of immunity typically afforded to sitting heads of state under customary international law.

08:25

How Maduro’s abduction is set to change Latin America

How Maduro’s abduction is set to change Latin America
The US approach extends beyond military action into diplomacy. Trump has repeatedly expressed interest in acquiring Greenland, and when asked whether this goal or preserving Nato should take priority, he admitted that “it may be a choice”.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x