Advertisement
Advertisement

When Forced Sales Turn into Fire Sales

[Sponsored Article] Why and when do forced sales of assets result in discounts of “fire sale” proportions? Although it is known that fire sale discounts exist and can be substantial, it has been difficult to identify when forced sales result in fire sale discounts. Forced sales are typically triggered by industry-wide or asset-specific adverse shocks that affect both supply and demand for the particular asset. For instance, foreclosure and bankruptcy sales tend to occur when house prices fall, which makes it difficult to isolate the effect of forced sales on prices from the effect of the confounding shock. It is necessary to somehow separate supply and demand effects.

Paid Post:HKUST Business School

[Sponsored Article] 

Fire Sales and House Prices: Evidence from Estate Sales Due to Sudden Death
ANDERSEN, Steffen | NIELSEN, Kasper Meisner
Management Science 63 (1), 201-212. January 2017 

 

Why and when do forced sales of assets result in discounts of “fire sale” proportions? Although it is known that fire sale discounts exist and can be substantial, it has been difficult to identify when forced sales result in fire sale discounts. Forced sales are typically triggered by industry-wide or asset-specific adverse shocks that affect both supply and demand for the particular asset. For instance, foreclosure and bankruptcy sales tend to occur when house prices fall, which makes it difficult to isolate the effect of forced sales on prices from the effect of the confounding shock. It is necessary to somehow separate supply and demand effects.

Steffen Andersen and Kasper Meisner Nielsen utilized the particular institutional setting surrounding inheritance cases in Denmark to investigate forced sales turning into fire sales. Their “natural experiment” examined sales of property resulting from the sudden deaths of house owners. The Danish Inheritance Act requires estates to be settled in probate court within 12 months of the death. As a result, the suddenly deceased’s house is either forced to be sold or forced to be transferred to beneficiaries.

These circumstances provided the researchers with a random draw of house owners, ensuring that individual and house characteristics were exogenous. Second, forced sales due to sudden deaths are unrelated to the current supply and demand for houses, allowing Andersen and Nielsen to identify market conditions under which forced sales occur at fire sale discounts. Third, because of the 12-month deadline, they were able to identify urgent sales. Collectively, these attributes ensured that sales in the sample were triggered by unanticipated events, allowing them to identity when forced sales led to fire sales discounts. In comparison, prior literature has estimated the discount on forced sales as the result of financial distress, mutual fund outflows, bankruptcy or foreclosure.

To examine the effect of forced sales, the researchers followed a standard approach in real estate economics that explains variation in house prices with factors such as house characteristics (interior size, building age, number of rooms etc.) and time effects. The study revealed that forced sales resulted in an average discount of 8.9%. The discount increased as the 12-month deadline neared. Sales shortly after the sudden death occur at market prices, whereas sales in the last three months before the deadline result in an average discount of 14%.

Although asking prices might decline with the time on the market, the pricing pattern suggests that this alone cannot explain the estimated discount. Under the alternative hypothesis of a time-on-the-market effect, one would expect to observe a premium on early forced sales and a discount on late forced sales. The researchers observed, on the contrary, that early sales occurred at market prices and late sales occurred at deep discounts. They examined how market conditions affected the discount, and found an average discount of 7.5% during years when prices increased by 10% or more, whereas the discount during years when house prices contracted averaged 12.6%. Thus, the discount is 5.1% larger during “bust” years with contracting house prices. The findings of discounts during boom years highlights the fact that discounts arise when sales are urgent even in the absence of an adverse shock affecting the demand for the house.

Post