Opinion | Top court's CSSA ruling a sound defence of our constitution

Cliff Buddle says ruling against denying new migrants social welfare payments upholds equality and our constitutional rights

SoCo community officer Sze Lai-shan and Richard Tsoi Yiu-Cheong of Democratic Party leave Court of Final Appeal on December 17, 2013 after the court ruled that the requirement for social security applicants to have stayed in Hong Kong for seven years is unconstitutional. Photo: SCMP/Sam Tsang

One of the reasons an independent judiciary is so important is that it enables judges to apply the law freely and fearlessly in sensitive cases involving the government. That spirit of independence was on display this week when the Court of Final Appeal ruled the policy of denying new migrants comprehensive social security allowance (CSSA) payments for seven years unconstitutional.

The unanimous decision is courageous. It signals that the court will be rigorous in protecting rights embedded in the Basic Law, even in the areas such as social welfare where judges have traditionally feared to tread. This is a welcome development.

Print option is available for subscribers only.
SUBSCRIBE NOW
Copyright © 2025 South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.