Time for Hong Kong pro-democracy lawmakers to live up to voters’ trust

The Hong Kong government postponed the Legislative Council elections and the National People’s Congress decided to extend the legislative term by at least one year. This created a dilemma for the pro-democratic parties because they had argued for an election rather than an extension. They even launched a public opinion survey, declaring they would bow to the will of the people, but the poll failed to show a clear result. This means no matter what they do, they will end up disappointing one group of people.

Ultimately, most of the pro-democracy lawmakers decided to stay on in the extended Legco. Given the city’s complicated political situation, their decision is reasonable and acceptable (“Democrats must stay on in Legco to fight their corner”, September 9).

First of all, directly elected lawmakers represent their voters, giving voice to their concerns and helping protect their rights, such as during the lead-in-drinking-water episode. Secondly, they play an important role as the opposition, fighting for the rights of the minority. Although this often involves time-consuming procedures or even court appeals, such resistance reminds the administration to consider grass-roots communities when formulating policy.

Last but not least, in any modern society, there should be a wide political spectrum represented in government to maintain public trust and promote constructive competition. Those staying on in Legco should remember these valuable principles.

Lawmakers have the ability and power to easily highlight social issues and make the government focus on matters important to the public. This is how they can justify their role and give hope to their voters.

Jack Chung, Sham Shui Po

Keep the faith in the people, don’t shut bars

The recent outbreak of the coronavirus in a Tsim Sha Tsui bar has now apparently led to the consideration by the authorities of once again closing all bars or pubs. This industry is already on its knees and, rather then take such drastic action, it may be a good idea to not treat all venues the same.

Certain areas have had little or no cases of the virus, so why should their businesses be made to suffer? Surely it would make much more sense to put some restrictions around the infected area for a short period of time to see if any more cases develop.

I understand the need to try and eradicate cases totally but, to be honest, five to 10 cases per day in a population of 7.8 million is extremely low. Unlike other cities, we should put faith in our residents to keep on protecting themselves as they have done, so well, these past eight months.

Duncan Hancock, Lamma Island