Opinion | Hong Kong does not need separation of powers to maintain judicial independence

  • While any suggestion that Hong Kong’s political system lacks separation of powers raises anxieties about the independence of the judiciary, the latter is explicitly provided for in the Basic Law along with other checks and balances

Secretary for Justice Teresa Cheng (left), Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal Geoffrey Ma (centre) and Philip Dykes, chairman of the Hong Kong Bar Association, attend the ceremonial opening of legal year at City Hall in Central on January 13. Photo: Sam Tsang
Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal Geoffrey Ma Tao-li recently issued an 18-page statement, widely seen as a response to the pro-establishment camp’s criticism of the judiciary because of recent rulings in cases related to the social unrest.
While Ma explained how the Basic Law safeguards judicial independence, he did not use the opportunity to directly comment – or wisely avoided it – on the recent controversy over whether “separation of powers” exists in Hong Kong. More importantly and unfortunately, Ma also failed to answer the question raised by the retired Court of Final Appeal judge Henry Litton in his column in the Post: for Hong Kong’s sake, how can the judiciary regain Beijing’s trust?
Print option is available for subscribers only.
SUBSCRIBE NOW
Copyright © 2025 South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.