Opinion | Preserving Fanling golf course or building public housing is not a binary choice

  • Supporting more public housing does not mean we have to bulldoze what the elite have built, just as advocating for the golf course does not mean we are ignoring those in need
  • Officials should be looking for creative alternatives and realise that stepping back from a former administration’s proposal would show how we have evolved

Golfers play on the Old Course at Fanling on June 13. The Hong Kong Golf Club’s Fanling course is set to lose 32 hectares of land, including nine hectares earmarked for public housing. Photo: Elson Li

I do not play golf and have not even taken a swing at a driving range. I have made golf jokes about how I did not want to spend my time hitting a small ball into a small hole very far away, or how golf commentators are always soft-spoken as they do not want to wake the television audience.

However, real knowledge is knowing the extent of one’s ignorance. Golf must be a great sport, given that so many people embrace it, and a great place to conduct business, with so many deals struck on the course – never mind the US$10 billion global market for golf clubs alone.
Print option is available for subscribers only.
SUBSCRIBE NOW
Copyright © 2025 South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.